Q. Lynn, I came across this interesting article discussing how California got it's name. What do you think? Was there an Amazonian Tribe led by Queen Califia?
https://aaregistry.org/story/california-its-naming-heritage/A. I have looked at this in the past, and I thought it would be a fun topic to revisit. Here is a review of my previous reading: (https://psychicfocus.blogspot.com/2020/10/california-secret-history-of-khalifa.html)
I have found a very different story about California than we have been told. That it once was a nation of black people ruled by a Queen that held the title of Queen Califa, or Khalifa. They were part of what was once a great African Empire that reached from Africa to Australia, and from Hawaii all the way to America. During history the royal bankers who created the English, Dutch, Spanish Trade Companies with their massive navy and armies slowly wiped it out. Christopher Columbus's navigator was actually African, because the Africans had already been traveling to America before the Europeans did.
One of the most interesting things I've found is that many of the legends about this nation said they had a caste of Amazon like women that road Griffins into battle, but after their nation was almost destroyed to a natural disaster, their spears, bows and arrows, were no match for the Spanish's guns. They were eventually wiped out. This is why when the Spanish tried to name the region Santa Cruz, the name didn't stick because all the natives knew it was California. Is it possible that some of America's black people are actually natives that lost the truth of their past in slavery? Can you see if there's any truth to any of that?
https://weewarrior.wordpress.com/2019/01/22/the-lost-civilizations-of-north-america-were-they-tartarian-cities/
A. GREAT question! I get that much of our history has been rewritten to fit the narratives of those that had money because the wealthy and influential want to be the heroes of their own story. There is good and bad on both sides of battle, and depending on what side you are on, you may have very different perspectives of the exact event.I get that power struggles have evolved, and people have conquered new lands only to be defeated later for centuries. Many groups of people were thriving, and the mud flood posed as a struggle for many societies to sustain and evolve. Several perished during this disaster, but a few of the strong did survive and attempt to rally together to become strong again.I see that all parts of current day North America were inhabited by a variety of natives to some extent when Columbus first came here. Some areas are more concentrated, and others were sparce due to the inhospitable climate and food limitations. The terrain was difficult, and it was by no means developed in the majority of the areas of North America, but none-the-less, there were native people surviving.When I focus more on California, I do get it was geographically separated from the land mass. I am drawn to the San Andreas fault line, but feel this is symbolic to illustrate there was a physical division. I cannot be clear if it was indeed something with the fault, a water barrier, mud pits or some kind of water/geyser effect going on. My impression is there is a definite barrier.As I look to see if there is a great African empire, I get that just as there were natives with their more olive and darker complexion, there were also natives living on the North American continent originating from Africa with very dark complexions. It looks more like a powerful empire in southern Africa existed, and smaller groups explored outward and developed smaller societies in northern Australia, New Zealand and eastward to current day California. This formed an amazing trade route, and the differing climates allowed for a variety of goods to be exchanged.I cannot confirm that Columbus's navigator was African. I get that Columbus knew a land mass existed west of Europe, but he approached North America from the east coast. I see the activity of the African empire over the Pacific and centered around the west coast.As North America was colonized, there was a battle between the natives (all of them) and the new comers, but I cannot see it was done in the way that was described. It was definitely brutal, and the natives didn't give up without a good fight. Many lives were lost on both sides, and lots of tragedy was experienced.And that is all I have for this reading. Thank you. Love and light, Lynn
I need your help! Let's grow the Psychic Focus community. Sharing and commenting really helps me out!
Click the tab above for more on Personal Readings, Distance Reiki or Life Coaching Sessions
Stay connected!! Please join me on the Telegram Channel or Telegram Chat
Looking for other ways to Support the Blog? Please click HERE:
Check out my book on Amazon: https://amzn.to/341G48y
Prepping supplies/food at the Brighteon Store: https://bit.ly/3MOYGwa
2 comments:
We see history being re-written by a specific woke and often racist agenda before our very eyes today, such as the NYTimes sponsored "1619 project," the demonization of Civil War era generals like Lee, who were National heroes on both sides, and the Confederate flag as being worse than Nazism and racist, and many other examples. The demonizing of the South and the removal and destruction of major public art for political purposes is exactly like the Taliban destroying the giant Buddhas carved on mountains like our Mount Rushmore or the destruction of the incredibly important major art heritage in Iraq, the TRUE cradle of our Civilization, after we invaded that country.
Last month I visited both Washington DC's National Gallery and New York's Metropolitan Museum and between these two woke institution there were at least six major exhibitions centered on African American art or culture in which the head curator of the Met's Egyptology dept claimed all Western civilization, art and culture originated in tribal Africa whose primitive wood sculptures were displayed in galleries alongside 17th C European painting. It's very clear the PTW are working overtime to villainize all Western Culture and rewrite history through the media, education indoctrination and now even art museums.
If people want to imagine a great (non-Egyptian) African culture with sophisticated buildings and advanced technology like in the comic book movie 'Black Panther', fine. But please don't embrace recent myths of California being ruled by a tribe of Amazons from Africa. I can imagine someone easily running with this myth and using it as a reason why CA, like Detroit, is so messed up now. Enough is enough, and at some point this crazy over reach to mollify perceived historical injustice to present day African Americans who often enjoy more advantages than other groups in terms of College entrance, holding public office in all major cities and financial governmental support yet hate what America stands for and want to change it fundamentally while disregarding the historical contributions of other ethnic groups, becomes a perverse form of racism itself.
An African empire stretching all the way to California sounds almost too fantastic to be true. The distance is four times the distance from Europe to the East coast. The aboriginals of Australia started using simple canoes only in 1644 when America was already discovered. Apparently the first inhabitants of California arrived around 17000 BC, but the oldest depicted sailing vessel from Africa is only from around 4000 BC, from Egypt.
I guess I'm just a racist white man for not believing in the amazing (and completely unsubstantiated) seafaring skills of black people.
I think the black people were created by interbreeding between white people and other more archaic species. This is also substantiated by genetic research.
Post a Comment