Earth, Mapping and Universe Questions

Dear Lynn, thanks for explaining tricky questions so simply and clearly.  You are bringing light into this world!

Here are some more baffling questions:


Q. The world map is very intriguing. When we look at the map upside down, the landmasses look like they could have been together in one giant mass at the north pole and are now spreading out downwards, like when you put a thick frosting on top of a ball and it spreads and drips down. Was Pangea at the middle of the North Pole without the Arctic winters or was it a mass just anywhere in the middle of the Globe? 
A.  When I look at this, I get that all the continents clustered around the Asia area.  I don't see it to the northern or southern area, but rather the central area, and spreading from there.  I also see that the earth was smaller during that time, and as it grew, it aided in the breaking apart of the continents.  I am also reminded that energy isn't created or destroyed, so when the earth absorbs the sun's energy, the earth has to expel it trough volcanic eruptions or store it, which causes the expansion at the belly of the equator (changing the face of earth to be more oblong versus circular).

Q. We all know about plate tectonics and even the direction each plate is moving. Do the land masses actually move or do they stay kind of stationary but the altitude changes as their surface rises and falls? 
A. I wan't completely sure I understood the question.. But as I see it, the plates do move, some more than others.  The Asia area feels like more of an anchor, but even it moves slightly.  The butting of two plates can create a rise in altitude (like baby mountains being born which continue to grow as the plates press into each other).  As plates pull apart, there can also be a little "sinking" on the edge or newly formed coastlines, but it doesn't look to be significant in Earth's history.    

Q. Looking at a "two color" world map (blue being water and brown being land) it feels like the water encroaches and submerges any low areas it can find. That’s no brainer, but when you look closely at the map, some areas appear to speak volumes. For example, areas between Greenland and USA,  much of Europe and England and the entire area between southern Indian tip to western Australia etc looks like it was once a huge solid land mass and slowly submerged leaving only the upper elevations as the land that we can see now (essentially creating islands).  
A.  I see a few things going on with regard to island formation. In some areas the islands were created because smaller land masses broke from a parent mass.  For example, I see that is how many of the islands in the Greenland area came to be.  If you can image (this is how I see it playing out in slow motion) a large plate being broken in half.  One big mass stayed as Canada, another larger mass became Greenland, and all the shards turned into the smaller islands in between.

There can also be situations in which the water rises in some areas while receding in others.  This looks due to some north pole shifting and fluctuations in the the earth wobble which alters the seas (and tides).  As this happens new lands can be created (such as Shelly Island below) or submerged like Atlantis.

Shelly Island 

Q. Could it be true? Were these island chains once  dry land? If yes, that would change the shape of Pangea as given by Geologists. Can you see Pangea on the globe? (Additionally, geology hardly says anything about submerged lands on the said locations with the exception of Zealandia and few submerged coastal cities here and there. They have even failed to explain why they couldn’t foresee the emergence of many new islands in the oceans that have literally popped up overnight (eg. Shelly Island) and the 60 km long, 8 meters wide East African rift that opened up in just 10 days that was presumed to take place over millions of years. They are in fact baffled to see a very long process happening this fast.)

https://www.livescience.com/10592-giant-crack-africa-create-ocean.html
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article176333161.html
A.  In many situations, just as how I described the islands off Greenland, there was one mass that broke into smaller ones versus a large mass that was buried.  That type of development doesn't affect Pangea.  

What does affect Pangea are the two MAIN masses of Atlantis and Lemuria that were not included.   Pangea, even though it looks to be an accurate hypothesis, is not exactly correct.  It's basically geologists best effort based on what they do know.  

Q.  This means big unpredictable changes in short time are possible..What other major land changes do you see occurring in the world in near and far future?
A.  The biggest thing I see is the Mississippi River becoming more and more shallow.  The southwestern portion of the United States also looks to become dryer (and struggle with droughts).  

Mariana Trench

Many of the southern South American coastal waters also recede, and land masses may emerge as a result of that (water level lowers).  Additionally, many coastlines in and round Europe look to rise.  (There may be more, but those are the dominant things that come forward.)

Q. Was Mariana Trench ever a dry land mountain chain on Earth?
A.  I cannot see that the Mariana Trench was ever on dry land.  It looks to always be filled with water.

Q. Will the Himalayas become even higher?
A.  Yes, there feels to be a lot of potential energy building up in that area that releases in the form of plates pressing together and turning upward (like putting your hands flat, finger tip to finger tip, and pressing the tips together until they have no where to go but upward into a praying position).  It looks to be a gradual and steady growth.

Q. Can/Will Yellowstone National Park volcano blow entire US away like the Atlantis?
A.  Eventuallllly it will happen, but it looks to be much further into our timeline.  I get on earth there is still work to be done (the creation of a 4D earth and ascension) before it will be allowed to happen. There are some intervening forces guiding and protecting that area.

Q. Was the big bang caused by a black hole suddenly expanding and releasing all of it's matter? 
A.  I see it more like a black hole vacuum taking everything in.  So much was consumed that it created an implosion, which then created so much energy that it (the black hole) EXploded releasing all the matter and energy previously consumed.  From there, that explosion aided in the process to create / form most everything..

Q. I know you say everything is connected to the Source. Is that true for our universe? Does our universe have a soul and when it dies, does it reincarnate into a new universe?
A. Everything either directly or indirectly connects back to Source.  Source wasn't created from this, Source is The Source from which everything else came to be.

Our Universe is full of energy, has intelligence, and to some extend has a soul.  It feels like a machine full of harmoniously working parts, and when something is off, it seeks a balance.  The goal and life path of the Universe is balance.  I cannot see where our Universe "dies" so it is difficult to see how or if it reincarnates.  

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.  Love and light-
Link to PsychicFocus reading on YouTube:  https://youtu.be/WNWGT3QhRzs

Random Read for Friday (released one day early :-)

Q. Lynn, For the past few months there have been so many news reports of small children being trafficked for prostitution. I know this hard to look at, but I have a twist on it. My question is, what would be some unexpected solutions we could do that would help children everywhere to be safe? Thank you!
A. I get the first thing is awareness.  Many people think the problem isn't as bad as it is, or that it wouldn't happen in their area, but the truth it that it could happen anywhere.  Admitting this and working together to spot unusual behaviors (like strangers taking pictures of other people's children) is a step in the right direction.  I see it like a neighborhood watch, but on a much grander scale.

Also, teach children not to fear the world, but really trust instincts.  Most times (even with adults) we get in compromising positions because we don't want to be rude, and go against what our gut tells us.  Your gut won't steer you wrong, and even children need to pay attention to what feels off.  

Lastly, I get the the people that run these rings do it for profit and deep down would be ashamed it it was exposed.  As people are discovered, they need to be publicly announced (much like registered sex offenders have to file where they live).  I get there are huge egos tied to these rings, and as they are found out, the realistic fear of public embarrassment would deter some of this activity.

Q. Were Neanderthals bred out rather than died out? Meaning were they mated into the human species to form another species?
A. I get there was some evolution of the human species, but they didn't completely evolve from Neanderthals.  I see that Neanderthals existed, and an update was done to their DNA via ET Geneticists which created the human species.  The "new and improved" species later evolved into what it is today.  Neanderthals were important, and sort of a test, and then their DNA was enhanced to create an evolved version of humans.

Q. Hi Lynn, I read that octopus were of no DNA match to any other creature on this planet. Who made them? Where are they from? And why are they here? Are they psychic?

A.  I hear the phrase "they are the brain of the ocean" and are much more complex than what most people think.  They have existed for thousands of years, and get they came from a meteor (what it looks like).  The meteor was seeded with the DNA or life force when it landed in the water.  I get the very first octopuses had a radio active or electrical element that made them like beacons for experiments. They also had a telepathic ability, but it looks as though that ability has dulled down over the centuries (due to non use and also toxin buildup). 

Q. Are the arms of the T-Rex accurate to it's body or do they belong to another dinosaur? I vaguely remember reading something that said the arms of the T-Rex were incorrect and that they actually had longer arms. Many thanks!
A.  When I tune into the T-Rex I get the arms are incorrect. I cannot see that the shorter arms belong to another dinosaur, but I do get the T-Rex had longer arms.  I also hear that if the arms were as currently shown, they would be useless.  He could not properly use them for defense, to eat, or other simple functions.  I hear the ratio of the arms to the body size and position of the should is off. 

Q. Hello, in ancient Greece there was a succession of women who were the Oracle of Delphi. Who / what were they? Were they really prophets? They supposedly gave prophecies in a vapor induced trance. What was this vapor?

A. I get these were highly intuitively women that came forward to share their gifts.  I see that as a new one was chosen, she would have some kind of prophetic dream as a sign that she was to be the next in succession.  Once her position was held, she looks to live in a semi-sequestered location, free of distractions so she can be at one with her thoughts, and her gifts could continue to develop.  I see this "vapor" being some version of a DMT substance that was naturally occurring in the area (some kind of plant, fungus, mold, etc). The "vapor" wasn't required to be intuitive (she was chosen though this dream process), but it enhanced what was already there.

Q. Everyone is talking about Taylor Swift's new video. The references to snakes/reptilian is pretty obvious and there's lyrics talking about Swift being dead. It's very odd. Immediately, my mind went to your posts about celebrities being cloned, etc. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3tmd-ClpJxA
A. I get this is her way of saying goodbye to the innocent Taylor because the PTW (Powers That Were) have gotten a hold of her.  She is being forced to follow the agenda, and she lost her autonomy.  She has to do what she is told or suffer the consequence.  The cloning is a real threat, and she is well aware of that.  The snakes and reptiles with the words "Look what you made me do" is in direct reference to what is to come of her, her career and messages in her music.  From this point forward she will be a different Taylor.

Q. Hi Lynn, can you do a reading on Joel Olsteen and his wife Victoria from the Lakewood ministries. I saw a photo of her and something about her didn't look right and I felt a bit creepy. I really like listening to what they have to say because it is different from other religious preaching. Many people don't like him because he was appointed to his position by his mother and never attended a Bible college or seminary. Some are wondering if Joel Olsteen is the false prophet. What is your take on these people. Lynn, much thanks - always.
A.  When I tune into Joel and his wife, they have a good vibe.  They feel to be genuine people, and take a different approach to the church.  Joel feels to encourage people to look both outward AND inward (much like The Law of Attraction) versus an absolute faith where things cannot be controlled and are left to chance.  I get they are scrutinized because of their differences, but they seem to have balance and take on the criticisms.  I cannot seem to connect to a creepy emotion tied to Victoria. 

Q. On a positive note, how can each of us more dramatically improve the energies around us? I'm personally focusing some time - irregularly, of course - to "pulling" energy into myself and sending it to Mother Earth. Occasionally, I try to radiate it around me, filling up the transport (bus, train, airplane) in which I'm riding, or the building in which I'm located at the moment. And I've also occasionally put up a "protective bubble" around me and others with me. Seeking to understand here: is all this effective? And what would be more effective?
A. This is effective, and a beautiful thing that you are doing.  The most important thing you can do is have positive intent behind your actions and hold that intent through the mental process of raising vibrations.  I also get that visualizing a color, and tying the positive energy to that color can enhances the flow (imagine the room, car, bus, etc filled full of that color).

Q. Lynn, have you heard about Carbon 60 Olive Oil? It is supposed to be the fountain of youth. Does Carbon 60 Olive Oil really work? Are there any cautions to taking it? Thanks, Lynn
A.  [I do need to put a disclaimer that I have not studied medicine, and this is from an intuitive perspective.]  
The first thing I hear is "Too much of even a good thing can be a bad thing."  I get in moderation this can be an effective supplement to your food to aid in the detox process.  The one caution I do get is that it can be a little irritating to the intestines (because of the excreting of toxins), so be gentle with it to see what you are able to tolerate.
(If anyone has tried this, please share your experience in remarks.)

In closing, one thing I wanted to mention is that it was brought to my attention after the reading on Censorship that Google and YouTube are manipulating stats and deranking websites that don't support "the agenda," including mine.  Please bookmark and share this site for future reference. 

And that is all I have for this reading.  Love and light-

Theories About Earth... Growing Earth, Global Warming, Flat Earth and Hollow Earth

Q. Years ago I had a significant realization that the Earth has been growing, gradually over millions of years. Lo and behold I searched the idea online and found others who believed the same theory and then I found this video produced by a well known author and illustrator: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ

What do you see about this? Has the Earth grown to it's current state and is it a constant evolutionary pattern for this planets or all planets in general? If this is all a true thing, when growth has happened in the past did it happen in rapid spurts that caused cataclysm or has it been gradual changes accompanied by periodic geo-physical events like we experience today (earthquakes, landslides, sinkholes, volcanoes, etc.)?  Thanks for all your work!
A.  i have always visualized the Earth as a growing living thing.  When I meditate and tune into the Earth, I see her breath much like how lungs expand and then collapse.  There is a living life force tied to Mother Earth.  

The sun nourishes this life force much like it does the plants and animals on the surface.  The energy is transferred and used for healing and also growth.  As the sun hits the ground, what is not taken and absorbed by the plants and animals looks to be soaked up by the ground.  Energy isn't created or destroyed, but I do see it being stored by the Earth.  The Earth slowly grows and expands by using this energy.  I always see this expansion occurring at a faster rate at her belly (the equator) versus the poles. 

This is a very slow process, only a few inches or feet a year, but steady and constant.  I see that occasionally a great crack would happen because of the pressure involved (I immediately go to the Grand Canyon) or earthquake (again due to pressure buildup).  

In its' infancy, our solar system was much smaller and the planets were closer to the sun.  The orbits do not look like concentric circles though, but rather may various orbits, some on top of one another, orbiting in every direction.. As the planets grew, the orbits changed and so did the gravitational forces involved (this is why we used to have mammoth sized animals and plants, because the gravitational force was much less).  It has taken millions and millions of years to get to where we are now..

Q.  I've been wondering about the whole cooling/warming phenomenon we're experiencing around the world. What can you tell us about the next 3-5 years about the general trend? Are we cooling or warming? What parts of the world will experience the biggest and most lasting change? Thanks for sharing your wonderful gift with us all.?
A. There are a few things going on with our solar system.  As the sun becomes more and more intense, the solar system in general is heating up, and different planets have atmospheres capable of retaining that heat, causing the planet surface to warm as well.  

Earth is heating up, but the other thing going on is a shift in true north along with a planetary wobble (so what does become truth north sort of "dips" down from time to time giving erratic weather).  I don't see the wobble "sticking" in a certain spot, but as true north shifts, those patterns will be more predictable.  

I also see all over the world within the next 3 to 5 years (as the Red Comet becomes closer to our field) we will experience temperature fluctuations all year long.  Weather patterns will be hard to predict, and things will be extreme.  We will see more earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, etc documented when compared to years past (in record breaking amounts). 

Q. Hi, Lyn There have been several videos and blogs about the fact that the earth is really flat and they have come up with proof as well as the reasons that it is not logically possible that the earth is a circular sphere.. What are your feelings about the flat earth idea and will they eventually change the teachings in the schools so the students will learn the truth? 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YQ0dMJEjsk
This next video has a map that shows the Antarctica as surrounding the flat earth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WWEbsGphhM&feature=youtu.be.
A. There are evidences that support both ideas, and when I tune in I see myself float above earth, and what I see looks like a rotating sphere.  I keep zooming out, and see the rotation causing night, day and the variations in between in comparison to the sun. Even though there are ideas that support a flat Earth, I cannot connect to it.  

Q. Seismologists learned a lot about the interior of the Earth through seismic waves generated by large scale earthquakes that penetrate into the depths of the Earth.  These earthquakes were recorded at seismic stations.  The data from the stations later gave rise to the interpretation that the Earth had different layers based on the wave speeds at which the seismic waves traveled through the Earth at certain depths.  Based on the speed at which these waves traveled through, the materials of the layers were determined to be silicates or metal, hence giving rise to the layers of the crust, mantle, and core.  Earthquakes generate different kinds of waves, where one kind (Vs) can only travel through solids and not liquids, and another (Vp) can travel through both.  This is how it was determined that the outer core was liquid.  

The discrepancy I'm trying to resolve here is...  Why is it that seismologists aren't able to detect this hollow portion of the Earth, as well as with the inner mantle and crust?  I guess my expectation is that at least the Vs waves wouldn't be able to travel through this portion, leaving a trace on the seismograms.  Is this hollow space more like a "pocket" within the Earth that is too small to resolve with the current coverage of the seismograms on the surface of the Earth?  Would it be possible to observe more layers (another silicate mantle and crust, and empty space) beyond the metallic core if one were to look closely at the seismograms, or are they somehow "blurred out" in the data? There was a recent discovery of an "inner-most inner core" a couple of years ago (a structure within the currently determined boundaries of the solid inner core).  Does this feature somehow relate to any of the currently undetermined/unknown structures that are related to the inner mantle, inner crust, atmosphere, and inner sun as you see it in the hollow Earth?

A.  As I look at the center of the Earth, I get that to get to the center there is a series of tunnels, caves and portals.  These (in the big scope of things) are very small and would difficult to detect on a scientific reading.  I then see the middle most portion that IS hollow, and again I see this as such a small area in comparison to the larger portion of surround Earth that it would be a blip on a reading.

If you were able to take the data and study it closely you could see anomalies where the inner crust mantle and inner core are located.  I also get that when many of these tests are done, they don't start at one point and send waves out the other side (like poking a pin all the way through a ball), but they send them to the middle and let them bounce back out.  This type of testing hides a lot, and if you could go through the true center rather that just "to" the center, it would help to get more accurate readings.  

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.  Love and light-

YouTube of Large Quake and Tsunami in NW United States

Q. I have had this video sent to me by several people, and many of you want to know is this true?  Is there a large earthquake and / or a tsunami headed for the northwest part of the United States? It is also strange that this information is being broadcast on mainstream Fox News.  https://youtu.be/M-Lccf54JGE
A  I do see there is a buildup of potential energy in the northwest portion of the United States that could take and create three very different time lines...To some extent there is some free will interference that will determine the paths.. Let me explain.  

In one path I see that as tectonic plates move, and the earth grows, stretches and shifts, the potential energy that is pooling up in the northwest will expel through Yellowstone.  I still don't see it as a large volcanic eruption that creates an extinction event, but rather several smaller eruptions that form along a line, similar to dominoes in positioning.  There will be damage, loss of life (plants, animals and people), but on a much smaller scale when compared to one massive large eruption.  I also don't see the eruptions happening at the same time, but rather over phases.  It is as if one eruption goes off, then 12 to 18 months later there is another... This goes on for around three to five years.

The next path looks to involve an earthquake in the North Pacific Sea / Bering Sea.  The shocks of the quake will ripple out and be felt all around this area (Alaska, Japan and NW United States).  I too see that a tsunami could come to those areas, but I don't see it as drastic as what this news story describes.  This tsunami looks to also reach Hawaii but a lot of energy is lost before it gets that far.  A tsunami of any kind is terrifying, but I also get there is some kind  of warning (more that just a few minutes).  It sounds like during the days leading up to the quake the earth makes VERY loud groans, something that is difficult to describe, but it will resonate that something very wrong.  It isn't just one groan, it seems like it is daily and very consistent.  Animals act strange and it looks like there is an unusual amount of animal deaths on the coast (more than what we have now, and they can't be explained).  The water looks to go inland as far as this coastal highway that runs north and south in California (I need to google when I am done to get the name), and then it recedes back to its' normal location within days. [Note:  I just looked this up and there is a highway like that called 101].

The last path I see (which is what I feel will REALLY happen) is our collective energy (as our consciousness rises) will help to dissipate this potential energy more gently that is built up within mother earth.  I get images of this energy allowing (and encouraging) earth to grow and stretch at the equator through some kind of slow process.  I get an image of a mother in labor pains and slowly breathing and allowing her body to relax and go through the motion, and get the earth is going through this same painful growing process.  I also see that positive ETs are guiding earth, and trying to help those that live on earth to guide this planet. Along with this "growing pain" of earth there will be some energy displaced, and there will be earthquakes and Yellowstone will eventually release (but in small chunks at a time), but they won't be as horrible as described.  I get that many times the worst case scenario is shown, and hear that the reality it is rarely that bad.  This is a wonderful time right now regarding the human consciousness, and those that are evolving which makes this third path so possible (and probable).  

Q. What is causing the build up of energy?
A.  I have always seen the earth as a living thing.  As the sun shines on earth, it feeds all the living things in one way or another.  The earth also absorbs energy from the sun.  Energy is not created or destroyed, so when the energy is absorbed it is stored as potential energy for later.  After so much energy is stored, it has to be used in the form of growth (the earth actually grows wider) or expelled through an eruption / earthquake of sorts.  

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.  Love and light-

Five Photos for Friday #6

Five for Friday #6

by Lynn & A Man Called Da-da

Hi, all. As usual, this session led to some serious eye-opening. Get ready.

Image #1:  The OOPart in the Rock

 Backstory: One of the most mysterious OOParts, or "Out-of-Place" objects in the world, this was found in Dorchester, Massachusetts in 1851, embedded in a solid chunk of puddingstone about 15 feet in the ground. The object is made from a mixture of metals, inlaid with silver, and shows high-quality workmanship. The stone itself was dated somewhere between 300 to 500 million years old, which most scientists think impossible. Da-da asked Lynn who made this and how long ago.

What Lynn Saw

 "I saw someone putting like a broom handle into it and turning it over. I get that it's a torch holder, not a bell or a candle holder as it's sometimes called. I get images of pyramids, but earthen pyramids. These torches lighted the inside of the pyramids. It was like a jungle in South America, but... this was long long ago, before the continents moved, when South America was right next to Africa, back when it was Pangea. It was actually close to Egypt, because back then all the continents were together. The people who made this, their world ended in a series of huge earthquakes, with enormous trees falling and destroying their village. It wasn't necessarily an advanced civilization, but an organized and highly skilled one."

[Da-da then asked about Pangea, and how it was formed.]

 "In terms of Pangea... the earth used to be much smaller. When earth expands, it does so more at the equator. It's like an orange, but with the fruit inside expanding out, while the peel stays intact in one spot, the orange getting bigger and bigger, leaving the peel bunched up in its original location, but now not nearly big enough to cover the entire orange. Then later, the peel or crust starts to break apart."

Image #2: The Thing

Backstory: Da-da saw this online and no one knew what it was. Whatever it is, don't put your lips on it.

What Lynn Saw

"I keep seeing fused-together bulbs. Someone put these bulbs in a container and they all fused together. If you put this in the ground, it might grow a rare and exotic, Jurassic-looking plant, with huge pink/white flowers."

Image #3: Title: The Upside-down Flag on the Ten Dollar Bill

Backstory:  This is a close-up of the back of a $10 bill from 1950. Is the upside-down flag a mistake, or was it done intentionally?

What Lynn Saw

 "I get that our money is full of cryptic messages. I get that this symbol has to do with signifying/announcing that it was time for a new way of doing things -- in a sinister way. At the time this bill was created, The Illuminati/Cabal was spreading its dark wings more, hiding in plain sight, mocking us. Every time we used this currency, it was like we were symbolically complicit in what was going on."

Image #4: Title: The "Lobed Disk of Saqqara"

Backstory:  This object was found in Egypt. What did the Ancient Egyptians use it for? It’s labeled, “lamp” in the Cairo Museum. Was it a lamp, or a ceremonial chariot wheel? Electromagnetic fan? Ancient Frisbee?

What Lynn Saw

"I see a sharpened stick would stick out of this. I keep getting flashes of gladiators. It's a chariot wheel from Ancient Egyptian times [seen below], which would have a spike or spear sticking out of it, like in the movie "Gladiator."

Image #5:  Title: To Moon or Not to Moon?

Backstory:  These digitally enhanced photos of the Apollo moon landings were recently released, allegedly showing greater background detail... but do these prove that these images were taken on a soundstage? If so, where is the soundstage?

What Lynn Saw

"I definitely get that the moon landing was faked. Every time I think of the moon landing I keep thinking of the song, "Californication," this one line: "...space might be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement." These photos don't look legitimate. But there are real photos somewhere of them fabricating the moon landings. I see the moon landings done on a soundstage in Hollywood.

[Then Da-da asked if this was referring to Lookout Mountain Laboratory, at the top of Laurel Canyon in Southern California. It was a huge, top-secret Air Force facility that also had a full-sized movie studio underground, with enormous refrigerated vaults used in preserving film while still inside the cameras (a technique used in overlaying/re-exposing images onto already-exposed film, which is how Kubrick did the effects in 2001). Lynn confirmed that this is the place where the moon landing films were done, and that Kubrick indeed worked on them, saying: "Yes, this feels right. There is a secret room in the basement where all this moon stuff went down."]

[Besides the quasi-secret base, all kinds of other things went down in the Hollywood Hills: the hippie and drug movements, and all the music of the ‘60s came out of Laurel Canyon right below this weird base. This entire building is now owned by Jared Leto... who's been looking a little MKULTRA'd, lately, in Da-da's humble opinion.]

And that's it. Hopefully your version of the world is still intact. Join us Friday after next for episode #7!

Q & A XLVI: Random Questions [Webbot Submissions Part I / Group Post]

Q1. We crazy followers of Clif's work (webbot) are impatiently expecting SILVER to skyrocket (like yesterday) Clif's work showed a distinct PROBABILITY of silver hitting $52.00 in November. He made this proclamation in the first week of November with silver at ~$16.00 so, it seemed pretty unlikely. Clif also sees silver making it to $88.00 by the end of the year. Your thoughts? We are all pretty convinced that the bad guys have been manipulating silver big time for years... I remember you were looking for silver to make it in the $40's back in July ~~

A.  I too see silver being highly manipulated right now.  The image I have is someone standing and passing out paper certificates (of silver) much like a black-jack dealer would pass out cards.  I get the people in powers are FLOODING the system with paper silver (or a certificate that can be cashed in for a later date for the "tangible" silver, which is really not so).  It gives the illusion of more silver existing than there really is.

While the price is held low (due to the over-supply versus demand) the people in power (and I am focused on those top 1%) are (and I want to use the word) gobbling it all up (as I see them grabbing all the silver nuggets off the ground).  So, the market is basically flooded with an illusion of silver availability, while in the background the physical silver is being bought up.  

Q. What is going on and why the hoarding?
A. I see our dollar in real trouble, and it is inevitable that it can't sustain.  There are so many tricks going on to keep it afloat (then I hear there is a lot of "robbing Peter to pay Paul" going on behind the scenes). Other countries are trying to slowly break away from the dollar, and are seeking out gold or stable currency.  Oil is what is saving the dollar, but other countries are trying to figure out how to work around that as well to take some of the power away from the US.  

The top 1% (probably more like 5%) want to retain their wealth (which they associate with power and influence), so they need to diversify their wealth into something of worth.  Keeping the price falsely low allows them to "gobble up" the real silver so when the dollar does plunge, they have an offset to their worth because precious metals will rise.  

Q.  How long can the dollar hold out and when is this to happen?
A.  I saw it happening at Christmas 2014.  The "robbing Peter to pay Paul" keeps happening and delaying the inevitable, but it can only be prolonged for so long.  I still want to say around Christmas we will see some drastic increase (if we stay on this timeline).  At the latest it will be the first quarter of 2015.

Q2. I would like you to focus on Euroland.  Do you see Germany , France , Spain or Italy leaving the Euro currency anytime soon? Or, do you see the Euro gaining any sort of "strength" if these countries decide not to leave....

A.  I see a couple things happening.  First, I see countries wanting to break away and do their own thing, but that poses some kind of threat to the overall whole and they are HIGHLY discouraged from doing so.  It seems like there is a strength in numbers, so I cannot see any being "allowed" to easily leave the current monetary system.

The second thing I see is countries starting some kind of a dual currency.  They don't abandon the Euro, but they slowly use another currency as well.  My focus goes to Germany (they really want to break free from the European system all together, but are too afraid to do something radical yet).  There is a lot of restructuring and sharing a system with several countries creates limitations on how to handle finances, and I see some countries wanting that independent control- they are just to afraid to do it.

Q. Lynn, I'm always interested when different predictive sources synch up with each other. For me, those seem to have more validity. I have long thought about Edgar Cayce's earth-changes predictions: the greater portion of Japan must go into the sea, Europe changing in the twinkling of an eye, and so on. I know that some of his are already proving not to have happened (yet), but I consider time to be fluid and multi-tracked and subject to our choices, so those "errors" could be explained that way. Would you look over his predictions and get a sense of which ones are still pertinent to us in this here and now? The National Dream center sees a MASSIVE tsunami hitting Hawaii....And a blogger named 9Nania sees New York city getting nuked soon..around Xmas maybe.

A. I first wanted to address timelines.  They can be difficult to pinpoint, and usually you see events lead up to and event or you get some kind of a trigger clue (you see a date, see a place, a holiday, sense a time of year, etc) and getting a year far in the future can be difficult because time lines can change with the continuous acts of free will and interventions from above (ET activity).  I believe Edgar Cayce was very on target if the timeline would have remained consistent.  Some things will be avoided, some delayed and some remain on target.

Looking at the earth there are some changes happening.  There will be some very erratic weather happening in cycles.  This is due to the wobble of the planet being much larger (If you can imagine a top spinning, the faster is goes the more upright it is.  As it slows, the wobble is much greater- I see the earth moving much like that.) To back up, the change in the earth wobble is due to another solar system approaching ours (which includes a sister sun, the "red comet" I have seen so many times and at least two other planets for which I don't have names).  The gravitational fields are being pulled on Earth and it is causing our earth to move less fluid (like a stutter at times- which causes the wobble).  


Back to the earth changes...  The tug on the magnetic field, and alterations in the intensity of the sun (again due to the other system approaching) is causing the core layer (not the center of the earth, but the layer that I see as the core made of molten rock) to heat up.  As it heats up (or rather energy from the intense sun is absorbed and stored like a battery- remember energy isn't created or destroyed, but it can be stored deep in the ground- as potential energy in this case) the build up of energy creates not only a slight swelling or expanding of the earth, but plate shifting, earthquakes and volcanoes to erupt.  Some changes are seen abruptly, like when a volcano erupts, and others are more subtle, like the plates moving or earth expanding.  

The sudden changes are what I am focused on more, and the time frame is within the next year.  Some notable things I see are Hawaii getting hit with some devastating storms that actually devastate the beaches, as well as California (my focus on the southern portion). California is going to be dry (forest fires) and experience a drought-like situation and there will be concerns with the crops / vineyards [I also feel caution eating any food from there].   The temperatures in CA also seem very high, like records are broken this coming year.  

I don't see a tsunami in New York, but I see flooding.  The conflict I get is that drinking or clean water will be an issue in New York, however I see a lot of flooding- so there is water.  I also get an image of debris or dirt / sand being in the streets when the flooding subsides, but again, I can't see anything like a wave coming in. 

The gulf coast seems plagued with sink holes.  New ones (even small) seeming to pop up out of nowhere.  Some grow to be huge, and others stay relatively the same.  This will be more an more in the "alternative" news.

The northwest looks to deal with mudslides (the northwest gets rain but California does not??).  

Q. So, here comes another dark question. Could you let your consciousness float across our planet and tell us, say in 6 months from now, what the war situation on the planet would be? Kind of like 'remembering the future'? Do you see any large events happening? (nuke, bio, cyber, etc.) 

A.  This expands on the last question, so I want to go into it a little further and view the whole earth from a man-made basis rather than natural event...

California is going to be dealing with Fukushima for a long while.  The beaches are becoming more and more polluted (even though it is denied).  Part of the drought is man-made while they work on a way to neutralize the radiation (the don't want rain coming in through polluted clouds, etc and saturating the soil more).  I see the wildlife in this area highly effected.  Some of this radiation gets to South America and Hawaii, but the amount feels very diluted at this point.

The US is constantly fighting off cyber attacks from China.. This is going on now, and will continue to go on indefinitely, but the US is too scared to talk too loudly about it because of the debt they have with China and need they have for China to keep the economy afloat.  One real wrong doing by the US towards China, and China will force the Shanghai Gold Exchange on a huge scale- the US is trying to avoid it.

There will be a lot of threats of nuke attacks, but nothing comes to fruition.  The main way of passive aggressively attacking someone will be through weather.  I hear to "Remember if there is a hostile situation, and extreme weather appears, there are no coincidences."

Q. I have a couple of questions if you don't mind answering: The event that culminated in the banning of guns in Australia, the Port Arthur massacre, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Ar...28Australia%29

• Q1 Was Martin Bryant the only gunman? 
• A1 I see he carried a gun, but I can't even get a visual of him shooting it.  I get an image of a bunch of adults running around a kid playing paintball (Bryant?), and all the adults are shooting and the kid is standing there trying to figure out what is going on.  As shots are fired the kid giggles (so much it is out of context) and they all run around.  There looks to be many people (on the upwards of 5 or 6) involved in this.
• Q2 Was he under any outside interference? 
• A2 Yes, he was manipulated into walking around with a gun.  He really didn't know or comprehend what he was doing.  I also keep hearing something about "not to shoot Bryant by mistake" as the other men were taking their shots.  They needed Bryant alive.
• Q3 Any omission of evidence? 
• A3 A lot was omitted, like how they made him confess and many psychological test that were given to him.  I also get there were witnesses that saw Bryant wandering around and knew he wasn't capable of pulling off something that precise in that amount of time. If they tried to get Bryant to reproduce those shots it would be impossible.

Basically, after looking at this, Australia was sort of "tricked" into giving up their rights to bear arms using this one event as the source.  An unarmed nation is much easier to control than an armed one.

Q. Six weeks prior to that (referring to the above question) in Scotland another massacre happened which resulted in the banning of guns in the UK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunblane_school_massacre 

• Q1 Was Dunblane the only gunman? 
• A1 As I focus on Dunblane I flash back to reading I did on the Sandy Hook shooting in the US.  It feels odd and just doesn't add up. I see an image of a person shaking their head left and right, and I am questioning if this school is even real.  It is hard to answer if he was the only gunman, because I can't get a visual on him doing it, or if he did shoot something maybe it wasn't even a school (factory, warehouse??).  There is a huge disconnect and I feel I need more info because this feels like a puzzle with pieces that don't fit??  (Or maybe I can't connect to it for some reason?) In some way I feel like the US got the idea of Sandy Hook because of the success this had on getting guns out of the hands of people in Scotland????
• Q2 Was he under any outside interference? 
• A2  I don't know that I would call it interference, but I would call it layers upon layers of covering up truth...
• Q3 Any omission of evidence? 
• A3 Yes, there was not just an omission, but falsification too.  Nothing with this case fits, and it feels like it was forced.

And that is all I have for this reading. Thank you.