PRIORITY BLOG REQUEST: Chelsea Manning, Natascha Kampusch, Miles Mathis

Q1. During the incarceration of Bradley/Chelsea Manning there occurred a strange incident. One day while he was sitting in his cell a staged a rescue operation took place in his prison using professional actors and Hollywood special effects, such as people shooting, explosions and wounded guards. The story was that an anarchist hacker group had broken into the high security prison to try and rescue Manning. However, he did not fall for the scenario and refused to leave his cell and escape with his rescuers. Suddenly, within moments everything was back to normal and all his old guards back in position as if nothing ever happened.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/05/us/chelsea-manning-tried-committing-suicide-a-second-time-in-october.html?_r=0

What was the goal and purpose of this experiment and who was responsible for it?
A. I get that some of the higher up elites of the military were enticing her to escape in order to create a situation where she could be taken out.  Leaking documents implicating officers (and I hear the word "General" too) and activities wasn't taken lightly, and they were trying to sacrifice her to create an example.  I then see the bigger agenda being to incite a riot on the basis of those against the LGBTQ and those that are for (again, using her as a sacrifice for her behavior, but yet creating more chaos and divide).  Then I hear the phrase "two birds... one stone"  Her intuition kicked in and she knew something was really wrong in this set up.

Are these kind of psychological experiments common with political prisoners and was Assange exposed to a similar treatment while under CIA arrest this year?
A. I get this is common.  The goal is to discredit the person by creating confusion in logic, thoughts and even memories.  

Assange was exposed to this, but I don't see it being as effective on him.  He was able to (and I see him tapping on various parts of his body and side of face) ward off much of the psychological attacks.

Q2.  There was a famous criminal case in Austria in 1998 when a little girl named Natascha Kampusch escaped from her kidnapper Wolfgang Priklopil after having been been held as a hostage/sex slave for 8 years (since she was 10 years old) in a secretly built room under his house. The kidnapper supposedly killed himself on the day she fled and thus could never be interrogated.

The following investigation lasted over 7 years but to this day is full of contradictions, delays, cover-ups, lost evidence, and even involved the "suicide" of the lead police officer investigating the case (just weeks before he was about to solve it and pin down the mastermind behind it).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natascha_Kampusch

The official storyline insists on Priklopil acting single-handedly and denies that there was ever an organised child trafficking network involved. What is more strange, the victim herself wrote in her autobiography that "people will never know the whole truth" and has been withholding information from the police to this day, thereby protecting the real perpetrator(s). For example, there is an eye witness that insists seeing Kampusch kidnapped by 2 men. However, Kampusch denies any such allegations and claims that there was never more than one kidnapper involved.

Why is she lying and what leverage is being used against her to keep her from telling the truth about what happened in those 8 years?
A.  I get that her kidnapping was part of a much bigger pedophilia ring involving political figures and other powerful, wealthy (even royal??) people.  I get that she was kidnapped by two men "professionals" that were NOT Priklopil, and he paid dearly for her.  There looks to be some kind of "service" on the black market where people can "order" what they want.  

These "powerful" people (usually wearing black masks) put fear into her that she must never disclose any information because [I hear] "they will find her family like whispers in the night" and she believed this to be true with all her heart.  She feels to be haunted by those words.

As the police were working on this case, leaks in the police force advised one of the "Masters" in the pedophilia ring that "Priklopil had been sloppy" (??).  I cannot connect to a suicide, but rather see he was murdered (so he didn't have the option to talk or take a plea deal).   I get that is why evidence has been missing, misplaced, and makes no sense..

What would the lead investigative police officer have revealed if he hadn't been suicided? Considering the magnitude of the cover-up he must have stepped on the toes of some very powerful network.
A.  I see that there are checks and balances in this pedo ring.  People use coded language, aliases and title people in terms of Masters and Stewards of the Masters in their discussions (written and verbal).  They would have only uncovered the outer tier because that is all Priklopil knew.  He did; however, know the process he used to get what he wanted, and that is what the "Master" didn't want leaked.  

Q3. Miles W. Mathis is a painter, scientist, philosopher and blogger with very controversial views and highly fascinating articles in which he deconstructs media manipulation, the faults of mainstream science and the fakery of historical events.
http://mileswmathis.com/index.html

While his analysis's are deep, detailed and persuasive he subtly steers people away from investigating certain deeper and more occult topics. For example, he claims consistently that Pizzagate is Fake News.


Is he actually just a fabricated persona and all his articles carefully crafted pieces of disinformation by a team of very skilled intelligence agents? 
A.  I get that he does analyze differeQnt subjects, but he looks at them with a certain "bias filter."  With things that strike him as "off" he is able to submerge himself and find truth.  Things that are difficult to conceptualize or are very dark (such as Pizzagate) he tends to label as "Fake News" so he doesn't have to go down the twisted road or answer questions.  Poking holes in the Vegas shooting is very different that attacking the Occult (he is scared of them and their illusion of black magic). 

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.  Love and light-  

Follow Ups: 
Q.  After her escape Natascha was interviewed in several TV shows during which she pretended she couldn't cope with the bright studio lights. However, at the time she hadn't lived in the dungeon of her kidnapper for many years but was working in his garden and even going on excursions with him. Why would she fake being light-sensitive or did someone coach her to do that to add credibility to her story?
A.  I get some of her torture to be submissive dealt with light while she was trapped.  For example, they may leave her in bright lights for extended periods of time followed by extreme darkness.

I get the daughter was put "into the system."

Q.  Did she really give birth to a daughter while being imprisoned and if so, what happened to her?
A. Yes, I get the daughter was put "into the system."

Q.  In 2012 another investigative international team including the FBI tried to solve the many contradictions of the case but in the end they only confirmed the official story. This implies that the trafficking ring must have involved very powerful people and extend out on a global scale if they were able to add such a professional cover-up from the highest authorities..
.""  
 What part did the person behind the pseudonym "Be Kind Slow" play in the abduction and network?
A.  Honestly, I cannot connect to that pseudonym.  I hear phrases like "Master" "Junior" and "Steward."  Nicknames feel like very short names such as silver, hammer and claw (those are the ones I heard).  I get it is made that way to confuse and obfuscate traffic on the web (and even dark web)