Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Ferguson, Michael Brown, Martial Law [Group Post]

[I want to first say before I begin this reading that I am sorry for the loss of life the Brown family and friends have endured.  As I get into this deeper it looks like something minor and resolvable escalated into this tragic event.)

Q. Can you see what was the truth about Michael Brown and the Officer Darren Wilson. What really happened during that altercation?
A. My mind first takes me to the series of events of that day.  I see an African American man (Michael) inside a little store.  I get he walks around the store and I feel like I want to watch him because of the way he is walking (very slow, picking up a large amount of things and putting them back...)  It is like he is in there for a reason, but is wandering around aimlessly not knowing what he wants to get.  This isn't that type of store (then I hear that you don't go into a gas station store and spend 10 minutes looking at every bottle of pop in the cooler.)  The whole thing seemed odd.  

Then he walks up to the clerk when the store is empty, demands money and then his hand grabs something either behind or far back on the counter (I want to say chewing gum?) and puts it in his pocket.  He never brandishes a weapon, but alludes a gun is in his pocket during this robbery (I see his hand in his pocket and he is moving it around).  From there he runs out of the store, and when he is a few blocks away resumes a normal pace.

I also get that in that when he left the store he either passed off (or hid his loot) to someone as he walked down the street so nothing would be on him (except for the gum or whatever he grabbed- I still want to say gum.).   When the officer saw Michael, and Michael fit the description, he first stopped to just ask questions (not accusing just yet, but really to get information or see if Michael knew anything.)  Officer Darren wanted to ask if Michael knew anything, saw anything, etc all while scoping out Michael (semi suspecting it was him, but not able to accuse just yet).  

This is where I see Officer Darren get out of the police vehicle (I don't see a struggle in the vehicle, but rather right beside it). 

Michael immediately got defensive and shouted some expletives at Officer Darren, which seemed to come from nowhere since Michael wan't being accused, but rather questioned about what he knows.  I get Michael was VERY sensitive to that, and in Officer Darren's opinion over-reacted.  The both were then using foul language toward one another (I hear the F word a lot) and that is when it got loud.  Officer Darren was accusing him of obstructing justice (or some term like that) and used that as an excuse to further question (almost accuse but not enough proof yet) Michael and search him.  Michael was NOT letting that happen and would not comply.  

Michael would not allow a search, would not raise his hands- He wouldn't even take them out of his coat pockets which make Officer Darren very leary.. Michael did lunge toward the officer- not to intentionally grab the gun, but to push him away (Michael kept saying give me some space as officer Dan kept getting closer in fear the MIchael would try to run.)  Michael was agitated and very angry at this cop.  When MIchael lunged toward Officer Darren, and in the process got his hands on the gun, the officer didn't know what Michael was going to do, and THAT is when the officer gained full control of the gun and fired at Michael.  

Q. Did Mike Brown actually steal some cigars previously to his death? There was  NO mention of recovering this item and so trying to prove that he actually had committed a crime other than resisting arrest. 
A.  He did steal some small things as he walked about the store.  I did see him grab something  from behind the counter (I thought it looked like chewing gum, but it could have been cigars- I just didn't see it that way). 

Q. Could you look a bit more into how the situation in Ferguson is going to play out now that the officer was not indicted?
A. There is going to be looting, riots and a LOT of civil unrest in this area.  I also see pockets of groups all over the country following suit (like private organizations start to organize with picketing and protests- I get an image of Occupy Wall Street Occupy Wall Street that spread to some other cities across the country, but this is WAY bigger than that.)

This then leads to the next question...

Q. The public response to this feels unnaturally aggressive to me. There have been at least 5 different buildings set on fire as well as many cars, looting, and lots of physical violence on anyone in the area.
A.  This is unnaturally aggressive, and let me explain why...

I see that our country has been trying to pit people against one another for a long time.  As long as we fight against ourselves we are too distracted from what is really going on (then I hear the question "How many laws, bills or issues have passed that we haven't paid attention to because our media is focused on other things?")  This started with the Zimmerman and Martin case a while ago- a race war within the country is one sure way of tugging at emotions and hitting the "hot button" of many Americans.  You can "ruffle feathers with Obamacare or Abortion, but to really evoke a cause attack someones heritage."  

I also get that brutal crimes happen all the time.  The number one cause of death in African American men is homicide.  (As a note I looked this up after I heard this and this IS TRUE until they reach the age of 35- source).  The media took this one instance (even though tragic) and blasted it throughout the country to evoke the emotions of thousands if not millions everywhere.  I also get that undisclosed sources even bused people into Ferguson (both to create more chaos and also give the media some "good images" to televise.)  Then I get an image of a show called Confessions of an Economic Hitman in which our own CIA was known to go to other countries to not only cause havoc, but get the citizens of that country stirred up as well- Only in this case it is our own government stirring up havoc in our own country.

I also get that the media (under someone elses command) isn't being totally fair to this case because the way they are portraying Michael is not the full truth.  They are showing innocent pictures of Michael when he was younger and more "childlike" (I put these pics on the right) versus who he was as a grown man.  This is done intentionally to create more compassion and stir more emotions (I hear people upset because "How could someone shoot a little boy.")  I get that if you heard the real facts, and where there when it happened, things would seem much different that the way the media is portraying it.

Why are they doing this?  Something big is on the horizon (I want to say it is tied to the economy) which the citizens are not going to be very accepting of.  In the process there is going to be some civil unrest, and the government wants and needs to see how to best handle the chaos.  They want and need a reason to test military authority, Martial Law and see how we respond do that (are we submissive, or do we fight for what we think is right).  By creating an excuse in Ferguson, Martial Law will be viewed by the rest of the country as necessary and excused because we are "protecting ourselves from each other."  They get to test their "big guns" (the phrase that came to me) while the rest of the people watch and approve because we are "helping them."

I also get that once Martial Law is declared, it is hard to stop.  There will also be the underlying rule that if riots start elsewhere, Martial Law will be put into force immediately to avoid "another Ferguson."  Fear will keep people in line.

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.

Here is a link to a previous reading I did that touched on the situation in Ferguson that you may be interested in:

Sunday, November 23, 2014

Anonymous (The Men in the Masks)

Q. Psychic Focus, do you think you can do a reading on Anonymous? I'm very curious to know about where these guys are coming from and what their goal is. They seem to be an anti-illuminati group?
I don't see this as one man, or even a group, but rather different people located all over trying to inspire a movement (uniting one person at a time) to spread truth and open your eyes to the world.  It is true that this was started by one man- but the goal was to unite other like-minded people in this "movement."   I keep getting images of a passionate (and angry) man (like Alex Jones) who felt compelled to encourage Americans to take an alternative look at their environment (economy, government, current events).  Even as I tune in I see the mask (and can't see under it), and get the impression that the initial leader (the person inspiring the whole "movement") is someone we would recognize.   I also get any names used, or ideas of who we think this is are wrong (referring to the initial start-up person).  I also see they use the mask to not only hide the leaders identity, but also to promote a way for others to join in a safer way (by hiding their face) because many of the topics they question are so far from what main stream promotes that many have fear by association (in some cases), but the mask helps to hide that.

The anti-illuminati idea is just one aspect- the main thing I hear is "anti agenda."  The Anonymous movement has very perceptive people united together- they see the "bigger story" and shed light on it.  In some situations they have also prevented false flags because the see events align to make one possible, and blast the media with the facts before anything can be done (it is harder to have a false flag when people know it is likely to happen). 

Their goal is to take a look at the world objectively, and see things for what they are versus what we are told.  This movement is a created by people grouped together and spreading truth and making people "accountable" (this word keeps coming up a lot) for their actions.  These are passionate people wanting change in this very broken system.

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.

Friday, November 21, 2014

Q & A XLV: Mysterious Deaths Part III [Group Post]

Q. Jacob Erwin Wetterling is a boy from St. Joseph, Minnesota, who was kidnapped from his hometown at the age of 11 on Sunday, October 22, 1989 as he, his brother, and his best friend rode their bikes home one night from a convenience store. The boys were stopped by a man wearing a mask. He told the boys to lie face down in the ditch. They were all asked their ages. His brother and best friend were told to run, and not look back , or they would be shot. Jacob was abducted. His whereabouts and perpetrator are still unknown. 
A. As soon as I read this question I immediately felt panic and the movie I Know My First Name is Steven comes up.  I get this perpetrator had a mental imbalance very similar to the perpetrator in this movie, and the fate of this young man was very similar.  I get this man sort of "shopped" for young boys that he took based on size, age, even hair and eye color.  These children felt scared, helpless and powerless against him.  

Eventually Jacob was killed by this man- the abuse was too much, and he sort of willed himself to pass away during a session of abuse.  At that very moment when Jacobs's soul left his body, he was at peace.  It feels so serene- and I hear a high pitch sound or vibration, but it was beautiful as if it protected him in some way.  

When I snap back to focus on this man to get a description, I see a Caucasian man, average height, dark brown curly hair.  When I look for identifying marks I see a dot in the middle of his forehead, but it looks to be a birthmark of some sort- I get he was made fun of as a child for this marking. I also see a tattoo in the shape of a shield on his forearm with wring inside it regarding the word "hell" (there is a phrase, wording or picture relating the to word "hell").  The house looks to be a run down farm house that is close to, but not inside the city limits.  There is a corn field behind the house, and I see that is where he put the body, buried deep in the ground with bags of lye on top.  I also see the number 276- it looks to be significant (street number, area code, license number??).  

Q. Please can you do a reading on Whitney Houston's death and how did she drown in her bath water.Many people speculate the record producer industry are associated to many stars dying an early death.
Can you shed some light on this

A.  I get a sense her addiction to drugs was the center source for her death.  I do not see it as a suicide (even though I get a high amount of depression).  I get an image of someone from behind pushing her head forward.  It looks like she was sitting, and they grabbed her from behind her neck and pushed her head down (essentially folding her body in half).  It looks like it was only one man, and the image of this man reminds me of a stereotypical mobster.  He broke in her room like he was hunting her.  She was scared and shocked, but somehow not surprised- like she had been waiting on his arrival.  They exchanged words, and then when he didn't like what she had to say (the conversation sounds like mumbling) and grabbed her by the neck and pushed her down.  She was so out of her mind already, that she tried to fight him off, but it wasn't much of a fight.  She drowned, and when the man knew she was dead, he left.  

Who was this guy?  I don't see this tied to the Powers That Be... This has a more lower level, independent feeling.  Again, I get it had to do with drugs, drug money, drug dealers, that kind of thing.  She got mixed up in a bad crowd and I see some kind of blackmail gone bad in regards to her fame.  

Q. I'm wondering if you get any info about this guy... (family acquaintance)
A. I get that the night Ethan disappeared he was not in his right, conscious mind.  He either consumed large amounts of alcohol, recreational drugs, or a combination of the both.  I also feel like something he took or was on (maybe a prescription ??) intensified the effect of the other substances and made them react in his system more than what he thought (he was under the influence more than he even realized).  At the end of the evening when he was heading for home I get he accidentally drove his car off of a road or bridge (lost control) and went into a body of water (pond, river, lake).  I also hear something about to not to underestimate the water depth (even though the water may be low and you would think it would have been visible, it really wasn't).  I get the water ways in route from where he was last seen and where he was headed need to be searched.  

Q. Hi Lynn. Could you do a reading on Ram Tiwary? He was jailed for killing his roommates in Australia, but the case has now closed and he is out of jail. They never figured out who murdered the roommates. Could you see if Ram Tiwary is actually innocent? With the trial news on internet and papers years ago, I was always convinced he was guilty. But I just finished his book '99 Months' and because he used the actual trial words to show why he was acquitted, I think maybe I was wrong the first time.  If you do find the time, could you expand to see if any police were involved like for framing etc.?
A. I also get he is innocent. When the murders were first discovered, they were quick to blame Ram, and I get that Ram, even though being honest, didn't have a good alibi.  Because of that, he was accused based on a "he said / she said" basis.  He tried to fight this over and over, and I get there was a lot of negligence with the police (missing or lost evidence).  There wasn't any framing going on, but rather incompetence. I am hearing the phrase that "the handling of this case was a disaster."  I get it wasn't the evidence that proved his innocence, but it was something about the logistics of the death (maybe two people were involved, or the process itself, etc...).  He couldn't be him, and he was released for those reasons.  I get his book is honest and truthful.

I see the victims after they had passed, but I cannot see the murder (maybe the image is too brutal or not in my greater good).  I can't see who did it, but I do get an impression that it was more than one person that came in and did this.

Q. Hi,PF could you do a reading on death-mystery of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, our greatest freedom fighter next to Gandhiji. .Some say that Netaji was killed in a plane-crash while others say the newly formed government conspired to kill him, so he hid in some unknown place till age of more than 80+ in form of some babaji/Saint. This is our nation history's greatest mystery.
A.  First, I get this was a great man of high integrity.  He truly wanted the best for his country, and he was hated by other countries for it because Netaji could lead and army, and people would follow him (jealousy and fear).  It is true he was injured (I see explosions and him limping away from bombs blasting and dust everywhere), but I see he did escape.  He was hoping to heal and return even stronger, but the injuries he sustained made it very difficult for him, and he never fully physically recovered.  He did live to an older age, and passed away peacefully (I want to say he was somewhere on a mountain- I see the view, and was protected by monks- or some religious group of people).

Q. HI! I'm teaching research skills to my high school students using the Lizzie Borden case. What feelings do you get about mystery that surrounds this still unsolved case? Thanks so much!
A. I get that she did do it.  I see some kind of a split personality coming out (the mental image I get is Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde).  She doesn't remember doing it, and she grieved terribly over her loss.  In her "normal" state she can't even fathom doing such a thing.  I also see that she had flash backs that taunted her (like part of her subconscious was leaking through), but had no recollection of being in her conscious mind committing these acts.

Q. Could you do a reading on Tina Watson's death. Was it a planned murder by her husband or was it really an accident?
A.  I get this was an accident.  I see that prior to this scuba trip she had a minor injury (I see someone falling down and then jumping right back up).  The injury created minor internal bruising or tenderness (just a little soreness).  When she combined that minor injury with the ocean water, something happened that caused her to become very disoriented (kind of sick and nauseous too).  From there I see she lost consciousness and that lead to her death.

Q. Hi Lynn, I recently came across an article about Agatha Christie, the famous mystery author. There was a time when she was 36 years old that she disappeared for 11 days. What happened during those 11 days? The family's explanation after she was found was only that she was suffering from amnesia. Was this all a publicity stunt to boost book sales? Had it been a fugue state, induced by the trauma of her crumbling marriage? Or, had Agatha Christie planned the entire plot in an attempt to frame her cheating husband for murder? What do you see?
A. I get she intentionally disappeared because she needed a break.  She couldn't deal with anyone or anything- it looks like the verge of a mental breakdown. She was stressed and wanted out of the public eye.  She wasn't trying to draw in attention, but rather was escaping attention while she dealt with personal issue and emotions resulting from her life..  She was clearing her mind (she knew she was a mental mess and trying to regain control), and plotting her next moves in life- almost a vacation from reality while she developed some clarity.  The fame she gained from this was an unintended benefit.

And that is all I have for now. Thank you.

Thursday, November 20, 2014

Q & A XLIV: Random Media Questions (Powers that Be, Truth Tellers, New Sources, Paranormal TV) [Group Post]

Q. Dear Lynn, I read that the "powers that be" have successfully embedded their agenda into the psyche of the public via media for many years and that they even control the alternative media narrative to lure and identify those who oppose the nefarious agenda. Do they control the highly visible organizations like infowars, oathkeepers, or are these alternative news sources and groups authentic? If they are not authentic, then where can we find uncensored truth?
A. The first thing I get is that you are absolutely correct- the "Powers" have penetrated and control most of our media.  They censor what we are allowed to know.  IF the truth is leaked, it is done is such a way that it comes off as a joke, and typically the presenter is labeled as something less than respectable.  

Then I hear "Alex Jones may be a good guy at heart, but look how he is portrayed."  I get a message about in "real life" Alex is passionate about what he does, and the way he is shown is the media is completely sensationalized.  Alex is a frustrated man trying to spread truth while fighting a huge system.  He even realizes he comes across loud (and maybe obnoxious) at times, but he is SO frustrated (and the word SO is emphasized loudly in this message).  He wants to make change to a very broken system, but isn't sure how to go about doing it.  

Then I get that the "Powers" will go so far as to interview people that are truth tellers to intentionally discredit them (I hear the name Jessie Ventura come up).  I see Jessie being taunted in the back of the studio by something being played on a tv set, then they bring him out on stage for the interview (while he is already upset and agitated) and then ask him questions without allowing him time to give his response while interrupting him constantly.  Jessie get so flustered by it, he shows a side of himself and says things in a way he normally wouldn't, but the media got their clip they wanted so they could play, and replay it over and over for the public to see. Then I see people high-fiving in a back office and I hear the phrase "one more taken down."

I also see that the government has an entire group of people dedicated to finding people trying to make change and shed truth.  Their job is to post comments that throw people off,discredit people and sway their audience.  The also put and create false information to make stories go away, and make distractions to steer people away from the real issues.  I want to use the words "damage control" as if that is even somewhere in this groups job title or job description. 

Most every news source has some kind of influence, but the countries that have the least censorship, have more genuine news (you still need to use your own filter to see what feels truthful).   Many times you will hear a story, and if it doesn't sit right, or feels off- trust that it is.  We are given clues to truth, but not the full truth.  Alternative sources are good to get your brain going (and force your mind to exercise out of the mainstream).  And I am left with the phrase "Look with your eyes."  People can say many things, but proof is in their actions.

Q. What are your thoughts of the paranormal shows Ghost Adventures, Long Island Medium (Theresa Caputo)  and Dead Files? These are the ones I really believe in and feel that Theresa Caputo and Amy Allen are the real deal. I Actually have tickets to see her Please, please if you can focus on this I'll really appreciate it thanks so much. You are wonderful!
A. Out of the shows you listed, I do get some genuine, pure energy here... I will break them down. 

Ghost Adventures:  I see these guys seeking out, wanting to understand the paranormal layer of earth and trying to contact it.  I get at times during the show (because of where they are mentally) they over react (feel they were touched, etc when they weren't), but in reality they are just antsy because they have been touched, talked to and heard things in the past.  They let their minds get too "busy" and don't relax to allow things to flow easily. They truly depict what investigators do, and share that with the public.

Long Island Medium:  She feels very genuine.  She really wants to help people, and has a good connection to the spirit realm.  She knows how to see things and translate it to people (I have an image of her standing with an image in a thought bubble.  She then is describing what is in that bubble to someone else).  She carries herself with strong feminine energy and she is very confident in what she does.  Then I get it took her a long time to get that confidence, but now she is "rocking it."

Dead Files:  I see Amy as having a lot of talent.  I get there is a lot of behind the scenes coordination that has to take place, but not to let that take away from Amy's gift.  There are a lot of scenes created for tv, but the show gives a good depiction of her skills.  

Q. Are psychic twins Linda and Terry Jamison really who they claim to be, one soul split in two bodies? Are they really trying to help people with their gift? At first I believed in their gift but something feels off...
A.  When I tuned in to them, I get they do have psychic gifts, but I also get it is a little clouded.  When they first began this adventure and starting really trying to warn, help and guide people, there was a sincerity about it.  They felt humble, but something with that has shifted.  They are still good people, but it is like there is a new stress or additional energy that prevents their thoughts from flowing as easily.  I get their images aren't as clear to them as they once were- they get strong hunches or impressions, but the details aren't as specific.

Q. I'd like you to take a look at the video that I'm linking here and tell me what you can about it. Be warned, I get a very dark feeling from it and the reason that I'm asking you to "read" it is because I think there is much more to this story than people know. The video is an incident from 1987 where someone hijacked a television broadcast signal for a minute and a half. The description in the video says that they "broke in" but they just mean into the signal, not the studio. To this day, this person has not been caught and it remains a mystery.

I'll reserve my feelings on it for the comments if you make a post about it as I don't want to obscure your view in any way. Here's the link:
A. (First, I must say please heed caution before watching this, and mentally protect yourself from negativity as this is incredibly disturbing.  I may even pull this link down..)
I see this person was really fed up with the media and how government (even the Powers That Be) was being both manipulated and manipulative.  This man was mentally and spiritually out of balance, and as a result took his negative feelings and used that energy to infiltrate this television show.  I get the man felt like the quality of news out there is of such poor quality, yet people were buying into all the propaganda they were hearing.  As I watched the video he joked and said that now they have something to write about and calls them names.  He is making a mockery of the media.

I then found myself watching the background in the video.  I pulled myself away from looking because i get there was something more than making a Max Headroom skit- It had a subliminal feel to it.  I got that if you starred at it, something about it pulled you in and created a dark negative feeling that would take a while to shed off.  

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.