Friday, October 20, 2017

PRIORITY BLOG REQUEST: Chelsea Manning, Natascha Kampusch, Miles Mathis

Q1. During the incarceration of Bradley/Chelsea Manning there occurred a strange incident. One day while he was sitting in his cell a staged a rescue operation took place in his prison using professional actors and Hollywood special effects, such as people shooting, explosions and wounded guards. The story was that an anarchist hacker group had broken into the high security prison to try and rescue Manning. However, he did not fall for the scenario and refused to leave his cell and escape with his rescuers. Suddenly, within moments everything was back to normal and all his old guards back in position as if nothing ever happened.

What was the goal and purpose of this experiment and who was responsible for it?

A. I get that some of the higher up elites of the military were enticing her to escape in order to create a situation where she could be taken out.  Leaking documents implicating officers (and I hear the word "General" too) and activities wasn't taken lightly, and they were trying to sacrifice her to create an example.  I then see the bigger agenda being to incite a riot on the basis of those against the LGBTQ and those that are for (again, using her as a sacrifice for her behavior, but yet creating more chaos and divide).  Then I hear the phrase "two birds... one stone"  Her intuition kicked in and she knew something was really wrong in this set up.

Are these kind of psychological experiments common with political prisoners and was Assange exposed to a similar treatment while under CIA arrest this year?

A. I get this is common.  The goal is to discredit the person by creating confusion in logic, thoughts and even memories.  

Assange was exposed to this, but I don't see it being as effective on him.  He was able to (and I see him tapping on various parts of his body and side of face) ward off much of the psychological attacks.

Q2.  There was a famous criminal case in Austria in 1998 when a little girl named Natascha Kampusch escaped from her kidnapper Wolfgang Priklopil after having been been held as a hostage/sex slave for 8 years (since she was 10 years old) in a secretly built room under his house. The kidnapper supposedly killed himself on the day she fled and thus could never be interrogated.

The following investigation lasted over 7 years but to this day is full of contradictions, delays, cover-ups, lost evidence, and even involved the "suicide" of the lead police officer investigating the case (just weeks before he was about to solve it and pin down the mastermind behind it).

The official storyline insists on Priklopil acting single-handedly and denies that there was ever an organised child trafficking network involved. What is more strange, the victim herself wrote in her autobiography that "people will never know the whole truth" and has been withholding information from the police to this day, thereby protecting the real perpetrator(s). For example, there is an eye witness that insists seeing Kampusch kidnapped by 2 men. However, Kampusch denies any such allegations and claims that there was never more than one kidnapper involved.

Why is she lying and what leverage is being used against her to keep her from telling the truth about what happened in those 8 years?

A.  I get that her kidnapping was part of a much bigger pedophilia ring involving political figures and other powerful, wealthy (even royal??) people.  I get that she was kidnapped by two men "professionals" that were NOT Priklopil, and he paid dearly for her.  There looks to be some kind of "service" on the black market where people can "order" what they want.  

These "powerful" people (usually wearing black masks) put fear into her that she must never disclose any information because [I hear] "they will find her family like whispers in the night" and she believed this to be true with all her heart.  She feels to be haunted by those words.

As the police were working on this case, leaks in the police force advised one of the "Masters" in the pedophilia ring that "Priklopil had been sloppy" (??).  I cannot connect to a suicide, but rather see he was murdered (so he didn't have the option to talk or take a plea deal).   I get that is why evidence has been missing, misplaced, and makes no sense..

What would the lead investigative police officer have revealed if he hadn't been suicided? Considering the magnitude of the cover-up he must have stepped on the toes of some very powerful network.
A.  I see that there are checks and balances in this pedo ring.  People use coded language, aliases and title people in terms of Masters and Stewards of the Masters in their discussions (written and verbal).  They would have only uncovered the outer tier because that is all Priklopil knew.  He did; however, know the process he used to get what he wanted, and that is what the "Master" didn't want leaked.  

Q3. Miles W. Mathis is a painter, scientist, philosopher and blogger with very controversial views and highly fascinating articles in which he deconstructs media manipulation, the faults of mainstream science and the fakery of historical events.

While his analysis's are deep, detailed and persuasive he subtly steers people away from investigating certain deeper and more occult topics. For example, he claims consistently that Pizzagate is Fake News.

Is he actually just a fabricated persona and all his articles carefully crafted pieces of disinformation by a team of very skilled intelligence agents? 
A.  I get that he does analyze differeQnt subjects, but he looks at them with a certain "bias filter."  With things that strike him as "off" he is able to submerge himself and find truth.  Things that are difficult to conceptualize or are very dark (such as Pizzagate) he tends to label as "Fake News" so he doesn't have to go down the twisted road or answer questions.  Poking holes in the Vegas shooting is very different that attacking the Occult (he is scared of them and their illusion of black magic). 

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.  Love and light-  

Follow Ups: 
Q.  After her escape Natascha was interviewed in several TV shows during which she pretended she couldn't cope with the bright studio lights. However, at the time she hadn't lived in the dungeon of her kidnapper for many years but was working in his garden and even going on excursions with him. Why would she fake being light-sensitive or did someone coach her to do that to add credibility to her story?
A.  I get some of her torture to be submissive dealt with light while she was trapped.  For example, they may leave her in bright lights for extended periods of time followed by extreme darkness.

I get the daughter was put "into the system."

Q.  Did she really give birth to a daughter while being imprisoned and if so, what happened to her?

A. Yes, I get the daughter was put "into the system."

Q.  In 2012 another investigative international team including the FBI tried to solve the many contradictions of the case but in the end they only confirmed the official story. This implies that the trafficking ring must have involved very powerful people and extend out on a global scale if they were able to add such a professional cover-up from the highest authorities..
 What part did the person behind the pseudonym "Be Kind Slow" play in the abduction and network?
A.  Honestly, I cannot connect to that pseudonym.  I hear phrases like "Master" "Junior" and "Steward."  Nicknames feel like very short names such as silver, hammer and claw (those are the ones I heard).  I get it is made that way to confuse and obfuscate traffic on the web (and even dark web)

Wednesday, October 18, 2017

ElsaGate Awareness

Q. Can you please do a reading on the ElsaGate phenomenon? There is a huge amount of sick disturbing content on YouTube clearly targeted towards children (bright colors, cartoons). 

Many of these have the same themes and strangely look very similar. In trying to flag these videos I found that there are just too many of them. 

Please excuse the graphic images and language on the following videos, but this is important to see what is out there and what children are being exposed to:

Who is making these videos and what is the agenda?

A.    When I focus on this, I see a huge agenda that has been going on for a while now.  It looks to first start with Disney (and their movies), and then it merged to their television programming (and the word "programming" is key).  

As the Disney channel introduced new characters (such as Hannah Montana aka Miley Cyrus) and other shows tailored towards kids, the programming started to focus on parents that didn't know anything, mocking fathers and over sexualizing children.  The agenda of Disney (which gets support from the PTW Powers That Were) is to destabilize our country by destroying the family unit, and creating a dependence on the system.  This makes people vulnerable, and opens up many other making outlets (drugs, sex, pedophilia, etc).   

With the emergence of children having phones, tablets and other electronics, Disney (and their supporters) went the direction of YouTube as a new marketing tool for their agenda.  At a quick glance parents may think their child is watching something silly with Spiderman or other favorites, when in reality these are part of the disguise for a much darker subliminal and conscious message. Kids are being exposed to adult issues, leaving them desensitized to the seriousness of the message and also curious about things they are not emotionally ready to handle.  These videos create a situation where sex, drugs, drinking and inappropriate behavior is slowly being accepted, funny and even imitated.  The moral compass is being altered and it does not benefit our youth or our future.

Please be cautious of what your kids are watching.  So many things may seem innocent, but this type of agenda is being pushed on kids at an alarming rate. 

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.  Love and light-

(One final thought that came to me as I was closing this up is that YouTube claims to be on this, but they are owned in indirect ways by people that are pushing this.  Youtube is more concerned with scrubbing videos promoting free thought and expanding the mind...This is not the priority that it should be.)

Tuesday, October 17, 2017

Wild Fires..

Q.  I just came across a post on social media that has many pictures of neighborhoods and houses after the recent California fires and there are some strange anomalies as far as I can see. It looks like whole blocks are turned to ash and yet there are some green trees interspersed between the decimated houses. Very strange. Usually there is some semblance of the structures left, but there is row after row of flat land covered in white dust. Strangely reminiscent of the debris from when the towers disintegrated. What's going on here?

I will second Craig's request. I would love for you to look into the California fires. Seeing pictures of streams of melted aluminum from car wheels. . .but running down asphalt that isn't melted in the least. And disappeared houses--now just white ash--with not even a ceramic bathtub or granite countertop or even a chimney remaining. . .yet the plastic garbage cans out front are untouched. Yes, very reminiscent of the twin towers where microwave weapons (according to Dr. Judy Wood and others) may have been used. Who is really behind what is happening? And what is the agenda? Karl Mollison, in a recent channeling (interviewed by Denny Hunt), said it's from off planet. What do you get, Lynn?

Q.  [I have had a lot of requests / emails on this, so I did want to address it, but it feels best to keep it somewhat brief). 

When I tune into this, I get this was a form of arson.  It looks like prior to the onset of fires special "chemtrails" were released that contained unstable / semi-flammable chemicals that peppered over the area.  On the ground there was a small team of ex-military, privately hired people used to detonate special (I think it is said "thermite bombs"?).  The bombs were detonated in very specific areas, and certain times, resulting in these fire storms.  

I ask, Why California?  Why is this a target?  
I get there has been a lot of talk of California becoming independent which is being supported by both strong people and rogue members of Hollywood.  This situation is compounded by the divide emerging between those that want to break away from Hollywood and the agenda (that is stronger now more than ever), and those that are controlling and following the agenda.   The PTW (Powers That Were) need California to stay a part of the US to keep their desired control and influence over US politics (and federal reserve policies).  This feels like a punishment and message telling those that are trying to defy the PTW (Powers That Were) that they will obey, and if they don't they need to recognize the power, influence and force they hold.  

Please take a moment to send some healing love and light to the people of California!

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.  Love and light-

Here are a few articles I found after the reading.. I do encourage everyone to do their own research to see what resonates with you.  I am anxious to read the discussion in remarks. :-)

Monday, October 16, 2017

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

Q. Lynn, can you do a reading on Meghan Markle, the attractive and talented actress whom Prince Harry of England has been dating for the last year? She is a different choice for him because she is not British (which has certainly devastated the hearts of millions of young British women who had dreams of marrying a prince) and she is also a mixed-race woman from normal, American middle-class origins. She was also a UN Women Ambassador in 2015 apparently before she met Prince Harry.

Interestingly though, it has been revealed by her extended family that, through her father's lineage, Meghan is descended from a woman, Mary Bird, who was a maid in the British Palace in the late 1800s. Is it possible that Meghan Markle is the descendant of this maid and a Royal, who's latent royal bloodline is now being called in, you might say, to appease the non-wealthy public and especially the African-American community, tricking us all into thinking a woman from amongst us has made it into the Royal Family?

A.  When I tune into this I get that depending on what is politically and economically happening, members of the royal family are given choices as to who is a suitable partner.  They may have a few choices and sometimes they only have "one" choice.  I see that with the direction of the world, and trying to be more inclusive, the royal family is looking outside their normal constraints, and chose Meghan as a potential partner.  

The royal family is losing favorability, and also under some scrutiny, so they are trying to "boost their ratings."  The more people look at the activities at Buckingham Palace, the more they want to deflect and show how they welcome other people.

Throughout time there have been members of the monarchy that have had undisclosed affairs, and even children.  In the past when unplanned pregnancies occurred, the mother was taken care of during and after the pregnancy in exchange for complete confidentiality.  I hear "the mother and child will want for nothing."

It does look as though during Mary Bird's term she did get pregnant, creating a child that was a hybrid of royal and non-royal blood.  In some way the "royal" portion feels dormant until called upon.  With each generation, even though the bloodline became slightly more diluted, it was there.  Meghan too has this royal line in her DNA; however, it is in a "dormant" feeling status.  Should Harry chose her (and he has pressure to do so), the steps will be taken to awaken this part of her DNA (family gatherings, ceremonies, subliminally, etc).  

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.  Love and light-