Q. Lynn what is your take on the Wikileaks fake landing footage they released (can't say the implied destination as it will get you flagged)?
A. After watching this, yes this feels like authentic footage. The topic in general gets pulled from the internet, so I'm hopeful you can evaluate the clip for yourself before it is gone. I get that Assange wanted this released now because he too wants the deep state exposed. Many people are trying to get the truth out there before this next major election because should the PTW (Powers That Were) manipulate things, censorship will really be tough. Now is the time people are waking up, and the more truth or mind-expanding ideas they are confronted with, the better. We are upon a huge paradigm shift.
As a side note, most times when I tune into this topic the Red Hot Chili Pepper lyrics emerge, and they are coming through to me right now, "Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement..."
And that is all I have for this. Please do take a minute to view the footage while you have an opportunity. I'd love to hear your thoughts. Love and light, Lynn
13 comments:
Thank you for your insights, Lynn.
This story has been around in one form or the other for as long as I can remember, and I remember watching the actual video of what we believed was the Moon Landing on live TV. I remember the emotions that gripped us all from memories of JFK, to the Cold War, and so much else that was happening in our World at that time.
One version of the story that I like, but have no supporting evidence, suggests that the Hollywood version was the backup plan so that should anything have gone wrong, the PTW could switch to the Hollywood version, rather than the actual events, until they developed a cover story to report to the World.
Perhaps in our lifetimes the new Space Force will release information from the Sea of Tranquility that adds clarity to this ongoing question??
It's a bit of synchronicity that yesterday I was looking at a ew documentaries on the making of Stanley Kubrick's films, including the excellent "Filmworker" about his 30-year assistant Leon Vitali who clearly stated Kubrick had nothing to do with the fake moon Landing shots. After seeing the crummy footage from WikiLeaks, I'm inclined to believe Leon and that the televised videos of Apollo Astronauts on the moon were done by far inferior technicians. the many Apollo stills of astronauts on the moon using Hasselblads prove they were filmed on movie sets using Kubrick's from projection to create the distant lunar background, so if Kubrick alluded to the fake Moon shots in The Shining, he may have done so being mad they ripped off his special effects technology to create the ruse.
I smell it fake. while moon landing footage would be degraded hide the wires and simulate transmission, Backlot footage should be crystal clear instead of this blurry Mess, & then it's put on YouTube in a smaller frame further degrading it with big letters: WikiLeaks reveals footage...so blurry with a million jump shots that prove nothing. I believe it's another attempt to discredit the fake moon landing advocates in the exact same way that the fake Stanley Kubrick confession using an unconvincing look-alike actor did a few years ago. Just like that alien autopsy footage, it seems more this info than a Smoking Gun.
A few years ago there was a big wheel set in motion. With the election of triumph.
It was gaining momentum.
Lynn, I want to know how this fakery made the astronauts feel. It must have been horrible for these well-trained experienced pilots to be hailed as heroes, when it was all a fraud.
2007 Iapanese Mission confirms Apollo15 landing site! Landscape identical to pic taken by NASA crew. https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/ls15.jpg
I belive landing on moon was done remotely with no crew. All other was filmed in studios...
2010 Chinese lunar mission also spotted traces of the previous Apollo mission in the images, said Yan Jun, chief application scientist for China's lunar exploration project.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130527201104/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/sci/2012-02/06/c_131393210.htm
@Watch
Sending a machine is completely different from sending humans there. Machine can survive the Van Allen belt radiation, machines don't need to eat, machines don't have trouble with forces of acceleration/deceleration etc. I believe that in 1969, humans didn't have the technology for space travel yet. It was all filmed in a desert.
However, the strange thing is why Lynn said that even machines are not able to escape Earth's firmament when there are so many evidences that point that they did leave.
@Unknown: Thanks for the comments. I've heard a similar story with involved Stanley.
@Robert: Good point! Thanks for the comments!
@EA RW: Very true!
@Vicki: I know. I have actually thought a lot about that. I'm sure it is horrible, and I sense in some interviews I've seen that it really weighs on them.
@Watch, Ales and Cyber: All good points and observations. Thanks for sharing!
Neil Armstrong really kept to himself for most of his life afterwards and i believe he lost a finger in an "accident" at one point in the late 70's. Was he threatened somehow? I think a deception would have greatly weighed on him. He was a decorated Navy man and aviator with what seemed to be honorable intentions.
I don't know if any of you have heard of the first iteration of the Apollo (Apollo 1) that burned up and killed all 3 astronauts on board while testing at NASA. Could have been a warning or a cleanup operation if the participants were not happy with the plan.
@AL233: I think he was warned, and it did weigh on him terribly.
Post a Comment