Mr. Exotic the Tiger King

Q. Hi Lynn, This could be a fun post.  With all of us being stuck at home, many are binge-watching tv.  A newer series has come out on Netflix called Tiger King.  It centers around a zoo that houses exotic pets like tigers, and is managed by an eccentric guy by the name of Joe Exotic. It is a documentary that depicts a battle he had with a woman named Carole Baskin who claims to be a big cat rescue person and wants to shut down Joe's zoo.  In watching the series, she appears to be using tigers, etc to make money and does similar things as Joe, but virtue signals her rescue in the name of saving pets.  I digress...   As Joe and Carole battle it out, Joe brings to light the mysterious disappearance of her former husband, and many suspect she was responsible for his death in order to inherit his fortune.  Curious of your thoughts?  Did Carole kill her former husband?  What do you get?

https://people.com/crime/what-happened-to-the-disappeared-husband-of-carole-baskin-featured-in-netflix-series-tiger-king/

A.  This is definitely an interesting series.  I have watched some of these, and agree that Joe is rather eccentric.  In looking at all the characters or people depicted in this series, they all feel to be very tunnel visioned in their way of seeing situations. (They all live in their bubble and perception..)

In regards to Carole, she feels to have a very low vibe.  What I see on the outside does not match what I feel coming from within her.  I get that what she has a deep need for people to believe her and see her as a savior, and if people don't align with that belief, she has no use for them.  If someone were to come to her and worship her for what she says she is doing or volunteer time and or money, then she would have an outwardly appreciation for them.  However, if someone were to question her or make her feel the least bit defensive, then she would make them an enemy and use her money to quiet them through legal means, intimidation, etc.

Looking at her former husband, I get that in the beginning they had a good relationship, but as time went by, problems developed (lots of problems).  She was very drawn to his money, and liked that he rescued her from the situation she was in.  When the newness wore off, she was accustomed to the money, and didn't necessarily want to be with him, but didn't want to forgo her lifestyle.  She was in a dilemma, and knew that she could not have it both ways, but was determined to figure out a way.

To some degree she was a master wordsmith, and could use her words like a wand to manipulate people around her.  She attempted to discuss a split, but realized she would be left with very little.  The only way for her to leave and maintain her lifestyle was for him to "disappear" literally.  

I also get that there are other people involved in this.  I get she didn't make him "disappear" herself, but hired it to be done.  I also get that the ironic part of it was that she did lead or have him led to the tiger cages where there would be no possible sign of evidence.  I see that even if they dug up her whole compound, they would not find a body, because it doesn't exist.  

I do get she is guilty, and I cannot see how evidence of this would emerge unless the person that did the crime came forward.  I do see a timeline in which the person for hire commits another crime, and in the process of that conviction admits to making this husband disappear, taking Carole down with him (but I'm not sure if that timeline will come to fruition).  

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.  Love, light and health - Lynn 

To view free public posts, videos and discussion, please view
any of the following platforms:
Brighteon
BitChute
YouTube
YouTube BACKUP Channel
GAB