A. The big thing I get is they implant ideas into your subconscious. If you aren't aware of what is happening, they can tap into the collective by evoking thoughts or emotions. Here are a few of the things I observed, and I would really enjoy hearing your perspective as well.
 |
| Jason Mamoa CGI w/Green Screen |
There were a few anti-gun commercials courtesy of Michael Bloomberg. It is tragic when an accident occurs, and they took a few examples of those tragedies and used them to trigger emotions to encourage anti-gun legislation. (Bloomberg is also funding the Boogaloo in Virginia). The real issue is the "Big Game" promoters prohibited a Second Amendment Ad for Daniel Defense, blocking an alternative perspective. Rather than allowing opposing views where people can make up their own mind of what feels right to them, media influences through emotion what that choice should be. The media (backed by the Powers That Were) are afraid if they give people a choice, they will chose against their desires.
Women are taking on more and more high profile positions. Supporting and encouraging women is a beautiful thing. The divine famine is powerful, but more and more media is omitting the divine masculine. Oil of Olay created an ad called "Make space for women" which felt forced, unnatural, and in many ways unrealistic (how it resonated within me). The entire ad felt off. Things that are all female or all male don't feel balanced, and don't feel to embrace the yin yang energy. (Note how they are taking men out of movies such as Ghost Busters, Star Wars, etc.. this felt like an extension of that).
Soda Stream: Bill Nye. This ad had a comical spin of depicted finding water on Mars. This felt like programming and implanting ideas of space that aren't true.
FaceBook and Alexa. Both were featured. They want people to see the positivity behind these. They are convenient, bring people together, and a new way of doing things. The failed to mention the privacy you are relinquishing as a trade off.
Jason Momoa and Rocket Mortgage. This was a truth in plain sight. Things aren't always what they seem and the world can be a green screen.
The half-time show is another time for programming. In this year's show they had Shakira and J. Lo baring a lot of skin as they entertained families across the country. I see this as a way to create confusion in a lot of minds.
Let me explain... There is a clear agenda to empower women, which also includes an element of sexuality (can be a positive to an extent). In the process they are also encouraging women to be offended. They want women to be sexy, embrace their womanhood, yet be offended if someone looks or stares to long. They have grown women idols standing on stage in skimpy clothes while twerking and dancing on poles. This sets an example, as some women and young girls watch and want to emulate this behavior while comparing themselves to them (this whole mental game can challenge self-esteems if there isn't clear perspective). The flip side is then creating an energy or environment of having the same women be offended if someone pays them too much attention. It mentally messes with a lot of people, to the point people don't know how to react or what to do. It is all part of the confusion, and part of the breakdown of respecting the divine feminine (the beauty and nurturing that women bring) and the divine masculine (allowing men to protect and provide). Yes, lines can blur, but there is an agenda to destroy this balance.
And that is all I have for this post. I'd be curious of your observations as well. Love and light, Lynn
To view free public posts, videos and discussion, please view
any of the following platforms:
Brighteon
BitChute
YouTube
YouTube BACKUP Channel
GAB
9 comments:
Can you see if their machinations are successful in the end?
Or are they really being defeated?
I took meaning from the gold vs silver too.
@mycale: They are slowly but steadily being defeated. :-)
@Chatterbox: Interesting take. I didn't see that originally, but I can totally see how that was a sign once you mention it.
Thanks for the comments!
Link
I think the outfit worn by the male dancers, as well as their dance moves, are strikingly effeminate. Could be gender dissolution propaganda?
I have been drawn to The Wizard of Oz late last year with reading Finding Dorothy. Judy came out at the movies too.
The shoes in the original story were silver and one theory on meaning behind the story (there are a few) is the golf vs silverback.
Not to mention child involvement and the big female symbology.
Interesting.
It seems that black and white is a recurring theme in the half time entertainment.
@enlightened and Chatterbox: I agree. It is all about blurring lines and losing the divine masculine and divine feminine. There is also a confusion agenda- do you look, don't look, you are offensive if you stare, but they want to draw attention to themselves.. people don't know how to react in these situations..
Post a Comment