Sunday, August 5, 2018

PRIORITY Blog Request: Jet Fuel Hoax, Rockets and Lunar Wave


Hi everyone.  I know the past few readings have been intense and really out of the box.  I want to switch gears, but I first want to address some interesting (and also more out of the box questions).  Now that I know the direction this reading went, out of respect for the person that paid for this Priority request (with super interesting questions), please keep remarks constructive.  I'm fine testing myself, but name calling or insults will go to spam.  Thanks. 

Q. These clips are very recent, but there are these guys that believe there is NO fuel in commercial airplanes.  They call it jet fuel hoax.  It would be nice if you could shed a light. Or, is it just a scam to make money....
A.   I have looked at this theory before (but never did an "official" reading).  I did take a few minutes to look at the videos just to get in the right mindset before I continued on....  

I will say I cannot connect to planes running solely on compressed air.  I get the fuel itself (jet fuel) is very concentrated, and an element of compressed (or "enriched") air is added during the combustion process to maximize the efficiency of the fuel, but fuel (and occasionally a chemtrail cocktail) is used.  

Q. Also I found this channel "Crrow777" who has a video with an eyewitness in which she states that there are NO rockets going to space. It was just like a previous reading you did. 
A.  This is true.  I do not see rockets going into space because they cannot penetrate through the firmament.  When rockets go up, they really go at an angle.  From there they continue on until they explode on impact with the firmament, or they arch back down into the ocean to be retrieved.    

The same is true with satellites.  They are land based technology versus space based (that is why people in the navy or at sea have to use a different system of tracking and mapping because GPS does not work).   This is also why in rural areas sometimes the GPS or technology has issues because rather than getting a signal from the sky, it is coming from land based towers.  

The Space Station and Moon landing are also not as they want you to believe.  I've included a few links to previous readings on these topics at the end of this post. 

Q. Lastly,  the lunar wave is also interesting..  https://youtu.be/cCkZLmhl3-I
A.  I have done reading on this before (I will include a link below).  I still see it the same way as far as who lives there and the waves being tied to a force field.  The moon feels like there are bases all over it, and especially on the dark side, where we are not welcome (even if we could get there).  The moon does have a strange vibe to it.  I always felt like the earth was alive, and has a life force tied to her, but the moon has an artificial feel too (I don't feel the same essence given off, even though the illumination feels powerful).  


And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.  Love and light-
YouTube: https://youtu.be/P5TOvcIyW2Q
REAL.Video: https://www.real.video/channel/yourpsychicfocus
To further support the blog or my video channels, please visit me on Patreon.

20 comments:

A Man Called Da-da said...

It's like the moon was killed, its heart taken out. That's ok, a new heart's coming...

Craig said...

I've heard that the moon is artificial from many sources. If we haven't been to the moon , why did Neil Armstrong say that when they got there, that there were huge craft parked on the rim of a crater watching him, and they were not ours?

Robert Schoen said...

I really like these priority requests for how they get into interesting topics. As with the flat earth/antartica read, while curious I lack the passion or focus to direct myself to carefully analyze all factors in depth over a topic that might not be able to be conclusely provable when there are a lot more subjects I'm really into, and while I see the validity of all the flat earth proofs, I like what @Denise Christiansen wrote about the limits of our 3D perception and amnesia of our true self as to why we can only percieve the world as flat. I'm content to wait for the afterlife when I can get the answer directly from Elvis himself.

I immediately resonated with the idea of planes running on compressed air when it was brought up here a few months ago, and if they need some fuel to keep to prime the engines, the pumps and keep the hydraulics going, that's a lot saner and more believable than flying with two wings filled with tons of jet fuel. THe insides of a jet engine are an array of precisely angled steel blades that are like tuning forks and these may have come out of vortex research the Germans and Russians did with submarine propulsion, another vehicle it would be crazy to load up with feul to rum. It may be that an industry built on cheap feul technology is the reason we are able to fly anywhere and anytime economically.

Ma'at said...

My brother is a commercial transport pilot for SW Airlines. I myself have seen how jet engines work. I'm a little amused at these theories by people that could just as easily go to an airport and ask an engineer and mechanic how they work.

As for the flat-earth theories, as well as "the firmament", a trip to the university physics labs would seem to be in order. This stuff ain't top secret. It is just mathematics one learns the first two years of high school. Please.

A Man Called Da-da said...

@Craig ~ Neil Armstrong never set foot on the moon.

@Watch said...

@Craig You're right man! Despite the images being faked (probably from Kubrick) this soundtrack sounds damn real!(plz find transcript in vid1 and record of approx to lunar surface in vid2) 1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EOWqB_xVWA 2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgOe3nBiEi0.

Lynn White, Focus Sessions said...

Dada is right... I've done some blogs on this in the past. :-(

@Watch said...

@Craig, just found this, which further corroborates your thesys: " The Lunar landings have been spotted by China's Chang'e 2 lunar probe, the Indian Chandrayaan-1 probe, and various other independent (non NASA-funded) space agencies."

Unknown said...

Cheap psychic readings

loralei5551 said...

How did we get the beautiful pics of deep space from the Hubble? There was no Hubble if there are no satellites...these pics are just from land telescopes?

jetpakrat said...

Good gravy who opened the hateful floodgates?!?

Lynn stay strong (I know you are) and ignore this negativity storm. I promise you that among your regular readers who love and trust you explicitly we bristle at the new and not nice showing up on these recent comment boards.

Also a regular commenter could/should appreciate your generously shared talents for what they are--a gift. You know who you are. Please try and limit your combative quasi abusive comments-Lynn doesn't work (assuming that you've paid for a priority or private reading) exclusively for you. She is gracefully sharing and caring for ALL of us.

Much gratitude always and let's blast all this junk with love and forgiveness. (I'm saying this to myself as much as others. I can have a temper mouth when I feel innocents or kindness are taking it on the chin)

Oh and you must have popped up on someone's radar to have garnered new detractors. As my momma would say..."They're just jealous." ;P

PimpMyBrain said...

AS @Jetpakrat, keep going the good work Lynn !

We are all challenged about our own belives, to the risk of the burst of our own "confort bubble", during this incredible time! I still try to warp around this flat Earth subject, but i prefer to look at it with curious eyes. I am not angry or triggered about this topic, just puzzled.

It is still difficult to keep trusting about anything the media/gouvernments/militaries tell to us, where is all about to keep the control and people confuses. But in same time to continue to believe anything as a true, about all this incontestable things they pour in my mind, during all my live (education, TV show, fear to not follow, shame on family, etc.)

AS always, thank Lynn to the time you spend for this blog and all sorts of infos you share with us. And if You don't like the message, move away, but don't shoot at the messenger!

p.s : @Nina Stark : Please share one of your reading about this subjects, if you put a link from your "business site", to really enrich the debate. You just seem like you are trying to drain the disappointed from this thread, not very professional I think.

@Watch said...

@Craig, Just in time: The Japanese SELENE lunar mission also found and photograped the halo left by the Apollo 15 landing module! (https://www.universetoday.com/15579/japanese-selene-kaguya-lunar-mission-spots-apollo-15-landing-site-images/)

Raymond said...

Hang in there Lynn.

You are doing good things and you are the only one on the internet sharing your Gifts like this.

Thanks for your blog!

daisy said...

Thank you Lynn, for all your work.

I'm wondering if we're not seeing some of the Mandela Effect playing out with people totally unaware that 'another side' of them is presenting themselves in this timeline. I've come across similar stories recently in ME stories.

RL said...

I was quite shocked when I logged in to see such negativity in the last two blogs. Seems quite out of the blue... Don’t worry Lynn! You do a great job! I love reading your posts, I always learn so much and it helps me open my mind even more. Not just that, but I notice there’s always so much synchronicity between what you say and what I see in the world. (Symbols from our govt etc) I think it’s quite brave of you for talking about subjects that can be sensitive.

I noticed many are still talking about the flat earth thing.. this reminds me a lot of when one of my friends (who was an atheist) would dismiss anything I said about the supernatural, but asked me for help when a restless spirit kept bothering her at her new place. She was talking about full on apparitions. I gave her some tips about encouraging it to move on, etc. Even after all that she Still doesn’t believe in the afterlife. I tried to ask her where she thought the spirit went then... she really believes it vanished into thin air. Some people are just so grounded into their beliefs that any new information that is too controversial causes them to deny something that is in right front of them. I like to remain open minded because I know there’s a lot out there we don’t know.

I tried to understand all of this better and watched a video about how objects are perceived in 4D and 5D, etc. It was quite trippy.. a circle could be a square, or even a sphere, but a circle at the same time, depending on which dimension you’re looking at. It’s hard to wrap my mind around that one, but I’m not gonna bash it. We have enough anger going on in the world right now we need to spread more love. ��

Lynn White, Focus Sessions said...

Thank you so much for the kind words :-)

@Watch said...

@Beloved shiningstar: declaring that Neil Armstrong is a Liar, according to you is being kind and positive to his family? Less than two weeks ago Lynn declared in the comment sections: " I am all for objective opinion (we are individuals and don't have to agree on everything)." apparently this isn't ment for people willing to bring proof of theyr views. You simply declare us as 3d people and don't even care for providing evidence for your "more advanced" theories (objective discussions still needs showing evidence, specially if one is favoring new unheard concepts one has to bring proofs and not just using the argument "I already did X readings on this subject" This reminds me of the words of Nazi Propaganda Minister Goebbels who once stated: "keep repeating an unfunded story many, and many times until people buy them". You guys keep mutually declaring you as "saints" unwilling to provide any evidence of it! You guys suffer from the same ailment as the head of the Catholic church: the Papal Infalibility dogma!

RL said...

Watch and knock- to be honest you sound like a troll trying to discourage any kind of awakening. Maybe that’s not your intention, and I apologize if I read it wrong.. you just come off as a bit aggressive. There’s a lot of evidence out there that supports Neil Armstrong and nasa faking the trip to the moon, you can sift through them online if you want. Hope you have a good day :)

Tanner said...

@WatchandKnock
here are some points to ponder:
1. look at all the NASA photos of the Apollo Moon landings. What was the phase of the moon when the landings occurred, where are the landing sites, what does the lighting in the photos show, a. bright like daylight or b. dark like late evening?
2. look at the Japanese moon mission and the Chinese moon mission photos, again a. bright like daylight or b. dark like late evening?
3. How much light is "reflected" back to earth during a full moon? How bright would it be on the surface of the moon?
4. Notice anything unusual about the lighting in all the "on the moon photos"? How does this lighting compare with any time of day on earth?
5. What is the relative size of the moon to the earth?
6. How big does a full moon look from earth?
7. How big would the Earth look from the moon in the Earth photos from the moon? Bigger, smaller or same size as the moon from Earth?

Have fun and all the best.