Q. Hello Lynn. Could you discuss the origin of the hijab? I read somewhere it is somehow related to the Nephilim or fallen angels who mated with women.
A. When I tune into the hijab I get that what it means now has nothing to do with what it used to mean, or even serve the same purpose. Let me explain.
As I think about the Nephilim I see an image of spiritual beings coming to earth. It is like they have been cast down and forced to live at least one incarnation here to experience 3D. It looks to be a dual purpose of punishment, and also to gain an understanding. In the spiritual form they could not see or even understand that what they did was wrong. There was no malice or intent to do wrong, but they did violate a code. The only way to understand how this went against Universal Laws or the Source consciousness was to live and experience a mortal, 3D life.
When they were cast down to earth, I see some kind of throat chakra damage. It looks like there was some kind of energetic "grabbing" of the throat prior to being sent to earth. A good portion of the Nephilim experienced being dumb in the true definition, with an inability to speak. Not only did the face covering somewhat hide their identity, but I get that many possessed a scar from the "energetic" choking that would give away their true origin. For them to gain the knowledge and experience to earn going back to their energetic form, they had to hide who they were, so a face covering (or scarf of some kind) was used.
Fast forward in time, the face covering became adopted by princesses and other people in society. It was seen as a way to keep and give the appearance of someone angelic, but of human physical form. It was a symbol of how that person was to be viewed.
It then became part of the Muslim (and some other) cultures. Carrying with the theme of being angelic, this was more of a way to keep their women pure. It was thought to keep all eyes off them, and keep them only for their husband. As culture evolved (and in some countries more than others), I get it was also a way to keep women present, but not heard. In a sense, they were a shadow of their husband. I don't see that they felt oppressed, this is just how their dynamics are and is accepted. I'm reminded that oppression is in the eye of the person. What we judge for ourselves may not be felt by others.
And that is all I have for this reading. Thank you. Love and light, Lynn
An afterthought...
It just dawned on me when I tried to find an image of this "choke hold" that it reminded me of "the force" being used in Star Wars to hold, restrain and even lift someone from the ground. George Lucas may have tapped into this as well.
