Ferguson, Michael Brown, Martial Law [Group Post]

[I want to first say before I begin this reading that I am sorry for the loss of life the Brown family and friends have endured.  As I get into this deeper it looks like something minor and resolvable escalated into this tragic event.)

Q. Can you see what was the truth about Michael Brown and the Officer Darren Wilson. What really happened during that altercation?

A. My mind first takes me to the series of events of that day.  I see an African American man (Michael) inside a little store.  I get he walks around the store and I feel like I want to watch him because of the way he is walking (very slow, picking up a large amount of things and putting them back...)  It is like he is in there for a reason, but is wandering around aimlessly not knowing what he wants to get.  This isn't that type of store (then I hear that you don't go into a gas station store and spend 10 minutes looking at every bottle of pop in the cooler.)  The whole thing seemed odd.  

Then he walks up to the clerk when the store is empty, demands money and then his hand grabs something either behind or far back on the counter (I want to say chewing gum?) and puts it in his pocket.  He never brandishes a weapon, but alludes a gun is in his pocket during this robbery (I see his hand in his pocket and he is moving it around).  From there he runs out of the store, and when he is a few blocks away resumes a normal pace.

I also get that in that when he left the store he either passed off (or hid his loot) to someone as he walked down the street so nothing would be on him (except for the gum or whatever he grabbed- I still want to say gum.).   When the officer saw Michael, and Michael fit the description, he first stopped to just ask questions (not accusing just yet, but really to get information or see if Michael knew anything.)  Officer Darren wanted to ask if Michael knew anything, saw anything, etc all while scoping out Michael (semi suspecting it was him, but not able to accuse just yet).  

This is where I see Officer Darren get out of the police vehicle (I don't see a struggle in the vehicle, but rather right beside it). 

Michael immediately got defensive and shouted some expletives at Officer Darren, which seemed to come from nowhere since Michael wan't being accused, but rather questioned about what he knows.  I get Michael was VERY sensitive to that, and in Officer Darren's opinion over-reacted.  The both were then using foul language toward one another (I hear the F word a lot) and that is when it got loud.  Officer Darren was accusing him of obstructing justice (or some term like that) and used that as an excuse to further question (almost accuse but not enough proof yet) Michael and search him.  Michael was NOT letting that happen and would not comply.  

Michael would not allow a search, would not raise his hands- He wouldn't even take them out of his coat pockets which make Officer Darren very leary.. Michael did lunge toward the officer- not to intentionally grab the gun, but to push him away (Michael kept saying give me some space as officer Dan kept getting closer in fear the MIchael would try to run.)  Michael was agitated and very angry at this cop.  When MIchael lunged toward Officer Darren, and in the process got his hands on the gun, the officer didn't know what Michael was going to do, and THAT is when the officer gained full control of the gun and fired at Michael.  

Q. Did Mike Brown actually steal some cigars previously to his death? There was  NO mention of recovering this item and so trying to prove that he actually had committed a crime other than resisting arrest. 

A.  He did steal some small things as he walked about the store.  I did see him grab something  from behind the counter (I thought it looked like chewing gum, but it could have been cigars- I just didn't see it that way). 

Q. Could you look a bit more into how the situation in Ferguson is going to play out now that the officer was not indicted?

A. There is going to be looting, riots and a LOT of civil unrest in this area.  I also see pockets of groups all over the country following suit (like private organizations start to organize with picketing and protests- I get an image of Occupy Wall Street Occupy Wall Street that spread to some other cities across the country, but this is WAY bigger than that.)

This then leads to the next question...

Q. The public response to this feels unnaturally aggressive to me. There have been at least 5 different buildings set on fire as well as many cars, looting, and lots of physical violence on anyone in the area.

A.  This is unnaturally aggressive, and let me explain why...

I see that our country has been trying to pit people against one another for a long time.  As long as we fight against ourselves we are too distracted from what is really going on (then I hear the question "How many laws, bills or issues have passed that we haven't paid attention to because our media is focused on other things?")  This started with the Zimmerman and Martin case a while ago- a race war within the country is one sure way of tugging at emotions and hitting the "hot button" of many Americans.  You can "ruffle feathers with Obamacare or Abortion, but to really evoke a cause attack someones heritage."  

I also get that brutal crimes happen all the time.  The number one cause of death in African American men is homicide.  (As a note I looked this up after I heard this and this IS TRUE until they reach the age of 35- source).  The media took this one instance (even though tragic) and blasted it throughout the country to evoke the emotions of thousands if not millions everywhere.  I also get that undisclosed sources even bused people into Ferguson (both to create more chaos and also give the media some "good images" to televise.)  Then I get an image of a show called Confessions of an Economic Hitman in which our own CIA was known to go to other countries to not only cause havoc, but get the citizens of that country stirred up as well- Only in this case it is our own government stirring up havoc in our own country.

I also get that the media (under someone elses command) isn't being totally fair to this case because the way they are portraying Michael is not the full truth.  They are showing innocent pictures of Michael when he was younger and more "childlike" (I put these pics on the right) versus who he was as a grown man.  This is done intentionally to create more compassion and stir more emotions (I hear people upset because "How could someone shoot a little boy.")  I get that if you heard the real facts, and where there when it happened, things would seem much different that the way the media is portraying it.

Why are they doing this?  Something big is on the horizon (I want to say it is tied to the economy) which the citizens are not going to be very accepting of.  In the process there is going to be some civil unrest, and the government wants and needs to see how to best handle the chaos.  They want and need a reason to test military authority, Martial Law and see how we respond do that (are we submissive, or do we fight for what we think is right).  By creating an excuse in Ferguson, Martial Law will be viewed by the rest of the country as necessary and excused because we are "protecting ourselves from each other."  They get to test their "big guns" (the phrase that came to me) while the rest of the people watch and approve because we are "helping them."

I also get that once Martial Law is declared, it is hard to stop.  There will also be the underlying rule that if riots start elsewhere, Martial Law will be put into force immediately to avoid "another Ferguson."  Fear will keep people in line.

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.

Here is a link to a previous reading I did that touched on the situation in Ferguson that you may be interested in:
http://psychicfocus.blogspot.com/2014/10/ebola-scare-and-ferguson-mo-strangely.html