Q. CERN large hadron collider is starting a new search (with almost twice more energy) in March 2015. It will go beyond the one Higgs Boson (God particle) did, which they have already discovered in July 2012. Did they really find the God particle in 2012? What will they will discover this time? How did they get this technology? What do you think is the purpose and intention of CERN? Is their present effort dangerous, as some top scientists are claiming, such as Stephen Hawkins and Neil Tyson say- that it could destroy earth? The Shiva statue on CERN headquarters is claimed to symbolize dance of destruction (anyhow it is also known to increase courage). Is there something secretive in CERN that they don't want us to know? The following is a YouTube on CERN describing it...CERN in 3 minutes
A. Let me start by breaking down these questions... I do get they were able to see how the "God particle" is created, but they didn't see it on the scale that they hoped. [I have to say as I go into this question something about the term "God particle" doesn't resonate correctly. Even though names are arbitrary, there is some ego emotion tied to it- and that emotion doesn't settle correctly..??] The image I have is energy being forced at a high rate of speed, and then it slams against something which causes some kind of combustion/explosion, and from that explosion a piece of an atom is made (not the entire atom), but shows evidence that with enough power/force other parts of the atom can be made, and from there the possibility matter can be created.
Q. What will they will discover this time?
A. They are trying to complete the atom. They will discover how much force of energy is required. I see a lot of trial and error with them eventually realizing they cannot replicate on earth what nature was able to do when matter was created. I cannot see a full success (but enough partial success to prove how the process works and that in the right environment it is possible).
Q. What do you think is the purpose and intention of CERN? Is their present effort dangerous, as some top scientists are claiming, such as Stephen Hawkins and Neil Tyson say- that it could destroy earth?
A. I get that some brilliant minds came together and were able to "see" how matter was created from energy. These men (I see two of them collaborating) could visualize how something was created through excited energy that was forced to halt (and then explode). The intention was to replicate that process on earth (after a lot of thought, testing and design) by using the CERN.
As I tune into the intent, I get some lower vibrations tied to it. There is some level of ego [that term and feeling keeps returning throughout this reading] tied to this device. I get that they will try and try, but something [like a protective ET species] will prevent it from being successful at the level that they hope. I also get that humans aren't ready or able to handle the responsibility tied to creating matter- it isn't in our greater good at our current 3D existence.
Q. The Shiva statue on CERN headquarters is claimed to symbolize dance of destruction (anyhow it is also known to increase courage). Is there something secretive in CERN that they don't want us to know?
A. I see it as a way to try to attach (through symbology) CERN with the energy of this God that is known to create, maintain and destroy- all powerful, and all things. CERN is viewed (or wanted to be seen) in the same way with the same power (again the ego references come forward...??).
And that is all I have for this reading. Thank you. Love and light-
A. They are trying to complete the atom. They will discover how much force of energy is required. I see a lot of trial and error with them eventually realizing they cannot replicate on earth what nature was able to do when matter was created. I cannot see a full success (but enough partial success to prove how the process works and that in the right environment it is possible).
Q. What do you think is the purpose and intention of CERN? Is their present effort dangerous, as some top scientists are claiming, such as Stephen Hawkins and Neil Tyson say- that it could destroy earth?
A. I get that some brilliant minds came together and were able to "see" how matter was created from energy. These men (I see two of them collaborating) could visualize how something was created through excited energy that was forced to halt (and then explode). The intention was to replicate that process on earth (after a lot of thought, testing and design) by using the CERN.
As I tune into the intent, I get some lower vibrations tied to it. There is some level of ego [that term and feeling keeps returning throughout this reading] tied to this device. I get that they will try and try, but something [like a protective ET species] will prevent it from being successful at the level that they hope. I also get that humans aren't ready or able to handle the responsibility tied to creating matter- it isn't in our greater good at our current 3D existence.Q. The Shiva statue on CERN headquarters is claimed to symbolize dance of destruction (anyhow it is also known to increase courage). Is there something secretive in CERN that they don't want us to know?
A. I see it as a way to try to attach (through symbology) CERN with the energy of this God that is known to create, maintain and destroy- all powerful, and all things. CERN is viewed (or wanted to be seen) in the same way with the same power (again the ego references come forward...??).
And that is all I have for this reading. Thank you. Love and light-
6 comments:
Hello Lynn: they will not be able to open parallel worlds? Thank u. Blessings
Cern always reminded me of the very first mechanical and vacuum tube run computers that filled up entire rooms and did little more than today's pocket calculators. Primitive technology for what they were trying to achieve. Instead of creating matter, transmutation sounds a lot more fun and useful!
But Lynn, there are people who allegedly can materialize objects, woudn't that be a way of creating matter too? Or that isn't as dangerous?
@Camryn: That could happen... The bigger issue is the explosive nature behind the "combustion process."
@Robert: :-)
@Enlightened One: If you do it naturally- then you are fine. The man made interference is where is get complicated.
Lynn, do you see those who built CERN -- and/or those who funded it -- as trying to create something called a, "dark consensate"? That is, a new, unstable compound that's dangerous and can be used to make a weapon?
Everything you say is 100% accurate, right down to the ETs. CERN will never be allowed to do what it was meant to do.
-Dd.
Sorry, "condensate" not consensate! Typo-city.
Post a Comment