Monday, July 24, 2017

Should We Be Concerned?

Q. I've read that we shouldn't look at the coming eclipse because it will be used as a "weapon" to do harm and effect our DNA. Can you comment on this?
A.  I cannot see it as a weapon used to attack our DNA, but you still shouldn't look at it directly.  Not only does it have an intensity that is harsh to the eyes, but the energetic projection created through directly looking at it can be very intense to the system.  It doesn't look to attack DNA, but does look to create a very tired, flu-like effect that can last up to a few days.

Q. Do nuclear bombs really exist?

A.  I get nuclear bombs do exist, but not to the degree they are reported in the media.  They are destructive, much like the hydrogen bomb (Fukushima is an example, referring to the root cause of the tsunami and not the effect of the meltdown).  The real danger is the byproduct of creating the weapons and power, ie the waste.  If a nuclear warhead were to be deployed, it would be destructive and create havoc, but I don't see it in the same nuclear sense that the media portrays.  I hear that it would be far worse if the nuclear waste were to be sprinkled about.  I then hear that the reality of nuclear weapons isn't the reality that is shared, but creates a fantastic new fear stream... ???

Q. There are plans to block out the sun, do you see this occurring? 
Many thanks!
A. I don't see the sun being blocked, but I do see the sky being filtered to prevent a clear view of our sister sun and her planets.  I then hear the phrase, "clarity creates questions."

Q. Hi Lynn, 
What do you think of the Elevator game? It is a Korean urban legend game where you go on a elevator and then go to certain floors in sequential order and end up in a different dimension at the end. Is there anything legit to this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elevator_game
A. As I tune into this, I can't see this working.  I hear that to get to another another reality, you have to go horizontally through a specific altitude, not vertically to trigger an event.  It looks as though there are certain vertices in the world (like the Bermuda Triangle) that when you traverse through at a specific altitude (some may even be at 0) with other influencing factors such as magnetism and electric current in the atmosphere, you could experience a different reality.

And that is all I have for this reading. Thank you.  Love and light-

9 comments:

Alice L. said...

Regarding nuclear bombs, I was having a discussion with a politically savvy Japanese woman and she told me that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were False Flags. Basically atomic bombs were dropped but they didn't have the effect that was expected, so we fire bombed the cities. If you look at the photos of the aftermath, they look just like Tokyo after it was fire bombed. And, there are structures still standing that should have been annihilated. I did an internet search and found that they was NO increase in incidence of birth defects among survivors. The US made an agreement with the Japanese government to go with the narrative as we know it because they wanted a pretext to begin an arms race ($$$). I've found a few websites that have mentioned this, but they get pulled down pretty quickly.

Unknown said...

I heard that this eclipse is going to be a titlewave of love sweeping onto earth. This energy is going to be the second of 3 waves that have come/coming. If anyone has been feeling extra emotional, or it seems like old insecurities or thoughts are popping up, it may be part of the shift going on. This is the time to recognize, process and let go of anything that is not serving you. It's time to cleanse. And although it's good to do this anyway, at the time of the eclipse, we need to be a clean vessel to hold this powerful wave of love in a higher capacity. This is what I've heard so I'm passing it along!

Lynn White, Focus Sessions said...

@Alice: That was sort of what I thought, but was having a hard time understanding what exactly happened... Either the nuclear wasn't what we expected, or there is no true nuclear (was a little confusing the way it came through). Thank you for clearing it up, because this makes sense now. :-(

Robert Schoen said...

@Alice, That's an amazing revelation, which is also a kind of perverse good news, sort of like learning there were no or few deaths in the many recent false flag terrorist events, like the atomic bombs of Japan were a precedent for creating a false narrative to obtain a political goal.

However, it seems clear the unprecedented use of advanced technology during WWII, the German Vril saucers and foo fighters, the Tesla based use of eletromagnetism to make the USS Philadelphia battleship invisible that instead teleported it to another location and the use of effective Atomic bombs known from all the tests in deserts and islands brought a lot of concern and many extremely and intentionally visible saucer visits from other planets to intervene and warn us of our abuse of technology.

How horrible is it that what the US pretended to do so publicly during WWII, using nuclear energy to decimate a large chunk of Japan, they succeeded in doing secretly with the tsunami that created the Fukashima disaster. If fact, in the first place it was completely insane a country with the history of nuclear devastation even considered a nuclear reactor power plant, and perhaps because those in charge in Japan secretly knew Hiroshima and Nagasaki were faked, it made them complacent about the true dangers of putting Atomic energy plants next to the ocean.

EA RW said...

Ok, I saw a video last about pearl harbor. And the US government shut the fossil fuels down for japan. Wich made them (japanese) angry and wasn't as follow the commitments. So the US lured the japanese into attacking. I don't know if this is true but it's good to know if this a complete false flag operation. Now they have a reason to drop the atomic bomb.

Lynn White, Focus Sessions said...

@Robert: I agree on your emotion of perverse good news. I felt upset after this reading too. I know things aren't always what they seem, but this was a lot..

Robert Schoen said...

Right after I wrote the last post, I realized that even though the atomic bombs didn't work, the firebombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was perhaps just as horrible and destructive for those living there. The Americans also firebombed large sections of Tokyo and Kobe, so they had the means to do it. It would be interesting to research how soon after WWII those cities were repopulated in regards to the half life radiation that the bombs would have left, and if there was some off world intervention that prevented these atomic bombs from going off.

Anonymous said...

Hi all! What is your take on depleted nuclear bombs used recently in Alepo (Syria) by the US (who are there without any UN mandate)?
Is it overrated? Thanks!
https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/02/23/why-did-the-us-use-depleted-uranium-weapons-in-syria/

Anonymous said...

Hi!
Reffering to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs, which (according to you) did not explode and create a nuclear and humanitarian disaster:
-Back in 1946 Harry Truman approved a special study program (which gathered clinical data for almost 70 years) to better understand the radiation effects on Nagasaki and Hiroshima survivors (almost 300,000 hat contact with radiation).
-Are you saying that ALL the researchers involved, over more than half a centtury, did not notice that there actually was no excessive radiation on theyr patients? Many ot these US researchers travelled to Japan and stayed away from theyr families for a long period of time, just to pretend to examin people who where sound(referring to radiation dammage).
-Your statement also implies that all the japanese patients, who collaborated with the research (70% of all involved in the nucelar disaster did participate as the study below aknowledges) over all these years, just did it for fun, killing time? Japanese are evolved and higly disciplined people who would refuse to participate in a fake study.
-Are you sure you're serious about your statement?
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907953/