Friday, June 3, 2016

9/11 Truthers

Q. Lynn, Do you get any feeling about these 9/11 researcher/truthers? Some focus on 9/11 and some have broader reaching topics they study and speak on. They seem sincere to me but I would be interested in your input:

--Richard Gage,
--Richard Grove,
--James Corbett,

Thank you as always, I really enjoy your site.
A. The first thing I get is that many people have experienced an awakening "trigger event" in their life, and for a good portion of people, 9/11 was one of those events.  I see a cartoon image of a person watching a 9/11 news story.  Then, suddenly a "thought bubble" emerges containing a light bulb, and then the light bulb suddenly goes off. Due to the event being televised, and technology emerging (the internet was getting huge) stories were compared, and things didn't add up.  Many people knew that things just didn't "feel" right about what they were being told.  A collapse of buildings doesn't just happen so perfectly unless it is organized.  I can "smell" the explosive elements used as I type this (reminds me of a kids cap gun or firecracker).  Even news stories were compared and analyzed, and some media were reporting things BEFORE they even happened, such as the BBC announcing the fall of building 7 before it even fell to the ground Everything was set to happen a certain way, and a script was being followed.  I hear the only real "SNAFU was Flight 93 not making it to its' destination because the military used a gut instinct and shot it down.'

I see that some people were so passionate about getting answers, collaborating and finding the truth behind this event that 9/11 truthers began to emerge.  I see it like a movement and some believe because it resonates with them, some have done their own research and can't help but to believe due to the evidence, and others WANT to believe, but are scared because once you accept something as a truth it is hard to "undo" knowing a truth. 

I get that these gentlemen each (independently) did their research and came forward.  They were passionate at finding the truth, and sharing their knowledge.  I do see a sincerity in them, and they are trying to "wake" people up and encourage free thinking.

And that is all I have for this reading.  Thank you.  Love and light-

Previous Readings on 9/11 that you may find interesting:


Robert Schoen said...

Even those living in denial of 9/11 internally know the truth, but the concept of our government not being the good guys we were always lead to believe is too hard to openly accept for many.

Every other government on the planet knows we did it to ourselves and "terrorism" is a myth to justify expansionism and more war for profit. I wouldn't be surprised if the huge rains sweeping across the world now were all deliberate and done by HAARP, because destructive weather like Hurricanes, tornadoes and floods are the equivalent of war and there's lots of money to be made in the cleanup. In some cases these disasters, which banks LOVE, greatly help to prop up failing national economies.

We have to hold our politicians responsible. If they act like they were completely unaware or think its just crazy truthers, they forfeit the right to govern out of stupidity.

Alice Liu said...

@Robert Schoen — It really is sad that every other government DOES know this but Americans refuse to believe it.

I'm sure most of the people reading this post have seen Richard Gage's "Architects and Engineers On 9/11 Truth" but in case some of you haven't, here is a link to the documentary:

AL233 said...

Great reading! 911 certainly was a trigger event for me "waking up" years later but i had certainly been primed by seeing so many cracks in all of kinds of official truths not quite adding up. I look back now and wonder how I ever believed without question -- and I consider myself a bright, questioning person (do I now have to question that too?:)).

I think Richard Gage is a great ambassador for easing people into seeing 911 truth. He is apolitical and extremely knowledgeable and calm. James Corbett has a surprisingly funny five minute video on the 911 fable. I think its very effective at cracking the veneer of the official story without being heavy-handed:

David Turner said...

I wish the original question had included 911 researcher Dr. Judy Wood. Her focus is on the material missing after the so-called collapse of the buildings. Instead of collapsing into a pile of ruble, the buildings (more than just the 2 towers) were transformed into dust. Her conclusion is that this was done using a directed energy technology that is not known to the public.

Here is a short video that introduces her work:

Raymond G said...

Because of the internet and cameras on every cell phone; I wonder if this will be the last major attempt at something so public ? They pulled it off this time but something on this scale would be difficult to accomplish again. At least in the U.S.

@Robert and Alice.......There are 28 pages of classified remarks in the official investigation that have not been released. I wonder if there are other nations that know the contents of the 28 pages and aren't tell us about it? And I wonder if any of them have been threatened if they do know ?

Mr Cecich said...

Lets take some steps backwards from and realize our government isn't for its own people its nothing more than a big corporation disguising itself as a politically correct institution.And as we all know corporations will do anything at any cost Lie Cheat steal murder rewrite history to keep making money.Just follow the money trail leads you right to them.From PEARL HARBOR,TO NASA,JFK,HITLER, AND 9-11 WAR ON TERROR.The best place for any human on earth to begin is stop watching mainstream news, television and reading newspapers.Eliminate the brainwashing factor and you will be one step closer to seeing the truth.You would be hard pressed to find anyone that disputes the governments findings that also watches the mainstream news.To change these people they need to eliminate television.start thinking for yourselves.Don't let conspiracies become our reality and let us choose our own destiny.

Great blogger Lynn
Keep it up.

Alice Liu said...

@Raymond G — I'm sure they know more than what's in the 28 pages. I also think the 28 pages are a LIMITED HANGOUT OPERATION, a diversion to take focus away from American participation in 9/11 by putting the focus on the Saudis. (A limited hangout, according to the CIA, is "spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting—sometimes even volunteering—some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.")

AL233 said...

I agree Alice that those 28 pages are a red herring -- designed as an emergency lever for the powers that be to draw attention away from the true masterminds. I just hope if they are released that the same citizen investigators who have pieced together truth from the lies will do their work again and find grains of truth hidden in those pages. Did they think no one would ever figure this out? That must of been part of the equation and it tells what they think about the human race!

Mark Noeth said...

Thanks for the reading. It is good these truthers are sincere. I'm sure their are just as many disinformation people out there. Not sure if I buy into the government did everything theory. A well funded private group with the proper networks and conections would make more sense. I've worked with two black opps guys. They were both patriots. They both guard what they say as they should. Maybe some other government groups are not patriots or have a different idea of this concept. I can buy into the theory the government covered it up. They cover up a lot of things they believe to be necessary...

tara said...

free copy of Dr Judy Wood's book. I go with her version , directed energy weapon. Maybe something of Tesla's got made and was implemented. Id put nothing past the US government or the Uk one. Equally disgusting elite traitors to the people they are supposed to serve.

well worth a read and quite eye opening.

Emmanuel Goldstein said...


Dr. James Fetzer never destroys Dr. Steven Jones.

Dr. James Fetzer never destroys Mr. Richard Gage.

Mr. Richard Gage never destroys Dr. James Fetzer.

Dr. Steven Jones never destroys Dr. James Fetzer.

Mr. Richard Gage never destroys Dr. Steven Jones, but actually covers up for him.

None of the above characters destroy Mr. Bill Deagle, and Mr. Deagle never destroys them.

None of the above characters destroy Mr. Dimitri Khalezov, and Khalezov never destroys them.

There are many other names that go into the above category as well and NONE of them destroy each other, but ALL of them attempt to destroy Dr. Judy Wood...

It is widely known that the last time Dr. Judy Wood voluntarily spoke with Dr. James Fetzer or exchanged emails was February 2008. That is, it has been over eight years since Dr. Wood HAS NOT voluntarily spoken with Dr. Fetzer or emailed him. So why is Dr. Fetzer still so obsessed with Dr. Wood???

Dr. Wood has never spoken with Mr. Gage, yet Mr. Gage promotes disinformation about Dr. Wood at nearly every interview he does – if not every interview. Dr. Fetzer also promotes disinformation about Dr. Wood in nearly every interview he does. Yet none of them have ever refuted anything Dr. Wood has presented.

Yes, if you don’t like the lie behind door#1, they show you the lie behind door#2. Then, if you don’t like the lie behind door#2, they show you the lie behind door#3. Any lie is ok with them as long as it keeps people from looking at the evidence Dr. Wood presents. This is why “thermite” is ok with those promoting “mini-nukes,” and why “mini-nukes” is ok with those promoting “thermite,” etc. Even Dimitri Khalezov’s maxi-nukes or megga-nukes are ok with Mr. Gage and Dr. Fetzer.

WTC7 on 9/11/2001

Mr. Richard Gage got a lotta splainin to do! No sound of explosives! - No explosives! What does this tell you about Richard Gage and his agenda?

Dr. Wood does not make any claims. Dr. Wood is not an Internet blogger tasked with the job of swaying public opinion like Richard Gage, Dr. James Fetzer, and their government run organization is doing. Dr. Wood is a forensic engineer and scientist. Dr. Wood conducts research and writes reports. That is what Dr. Wood does. Dr. Wood does not have a dog in this fight. If someone has not read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, they have no standing to dispute it.




"When fascism came to America, Liberty was wrapped in the flag now carrying a cross."

Cheryl Bane said...

In addition to 911, Sandy Hook is another interesting event to look at. The truth is there was no shooter, no children died, and the school wasn't even functioning for years before the supposed event. Sofia Smallstorm and Wolfgang Halbig have done some awesome research on the subject. I like Wolfgang's list of questions/observations about the event, which are listed here:

Joao Gomes said...

Hi Lynn thanks for this post! You recently told us about the sinking of Atlantis and its possible location. Would you eventually be willing to give a rough estimate of when this happened? Thank You!

Hannon said...

@ Alice

As an American, I can honestly say, that I only know two people who "believe" the 911 story, and I put the quotes on it, because if they have enough drinks in them, they don't believe it. People only stick to the story, when they are in danger of losing their jobs, under social pressure, or don't want the attention brought to bear on their kids. We can say what ever we want person to person, or on the Internet, but if we start making a stink about things, in official settings, we lose business contracts, get tax audits, or even have CPS start poking around our kids. Nobody comes in and whacks us with a big hammer, but they do sick every agency under the Sun on us, in more subtle ways. And with the millions of subjective pages of legislation in this country, nothing a person can do in life, is technically legal. It could come any number of ways, but you get the point.

I will however, admit, that on the day of 911, I and everyone I personally knew, bought the story, hook, line and sinker. I'll never forget the moment, that it was announced over the intercom at my work, then they rolled out televisions, that our large Wall Street owned corporation bought, one week prior, that we didn't need, seemingly for no apparent reason, which now sends my "this is not a coincidence" detector off. Anyways, I was so angry, I supported the war, then like Lynn said, that light went off, once I had cooled down and thought about it. I don't know if you're stateside, but if so, or not, how did it affect you at the time?

Hannon said...

@ David

I wonder about that as well. I often suspect, that they used an amalgamation of conventional tech, possibly nuclear tech, nano tech, advanced energy tech, physical changes in the buildings during reconstruction after the earlier bombing, and even incorporated this event into the original design of the buildings. In other words, I think they may have thrown every thing they have at this. If they did, it would have ensured success, gave them a chance at real world testing of weapons, flex their muscles via high end weapons to all other governments, and provide enough different rabbit trails for us to follow, and argue with each other over what happened for decades, and prevent any person or agency from ever being able to conclusively prove what happened, in the muddied waters.

Hannon said...

@ Raymond

They can remotely disable the cameras, on every single phone that is made, in any given area, if they choose to. The only problem is, they're going to have to explain why and how that happened, so I'm guessing, that they might be asking themselves, the very same question, but I don't put it past them. I think that's one of the reasons why, all the latest fakes, are smaller, and usually contained in buildings, like churches, night clubs and such. All the cell phone pics, basically ruined the much smaller Boston Bombing for them. I'll bet the next time they're going big, it'll include fake attacks that take out internet telecom infrastructure, but somehow, as if magically, the television that runs parallel, will still be working just fine :-)

Hannon said...

@ Alice

I think those pages are BS too, even true(which I'm sure they're cooked up, with small amounts of truth). They make a perfect distraction, a back up cover story, a patsy to feed the masses, excellent black mail materials, something to quench the thirst of truthers, and perhaps they could even serve as a new narrative, to start another war.

Hannon said...

It was found that the explosive sounds were edited from recorded tv coverage, when they forgot to edit them out of archive footage. The news agencies called it, live tv splicing errors, or something silly like that. I think they used more than one system on 911, which is leading to confusion :-)

Here's a link with the explosive sounds, that they tried to keep secret:

Bee E-lightened said...

We say powers that were around here 😊

Craig said...

Lynn you mentioned flight 93 was shot down. If so was this using conventional weapons? And was there actually another crash site as well as the one that was known? Because at the official crash site the coroner said his job was over in 30 min cuz he couldn't find any bodies. Also part of the engine was found about a mile away. Just curious. We all know the main points and why it was done.

I have a close relative that is one of those die-hard fox watching republicans and he gets mad when I talk about this to him. He can't believe that people in our govt could do this so I just say, I don't who did it, I just know we're not being told the truth and let it go lol. He'll get it someday.

AL233 said...

You are so right Bee 😄 I should've remembered that one...its hard to escape the matrix!

Buddhist Lady said...

Thanks to everyone who referenced Dr. Wood. I'm afraid that I haven't read/investigated 9/11 very thoroughly. I am far more aware of and familiar with the devastating change in our national attitudes and culture since that event and believe Lynn has correctly interpreted/"seen" the subsequent limiting of our freedoms and placing of restrictions on our thinking and movement as a populace. Such horrific national moments are best judged or evaluated by the subsequent actions and reactions of governments, agencies, entities, political bodies, etc. I scarcely need continue by referencing those actions/reactions as irrational, lacking proper judgment and measured response, Draconian Orwellian responses.... Draconian? Draco?

Nikky said...

This is what supposedly went down, according to Bibliotecapleyades:

"The 9/11 event is not what it seems - from what we can tell a select group used a remote control system called "Global Hawk" to take over and steer the jets electronically on that terrible day, then they used Tesla’s HAARP (in Alaska) to pulse Scalar waves at the buildings turning the steel to jello.

Why? To create fear and to enslave more NWO idealism into our world once again. Steel CANNOT MELT at the temperatures that jet fuel burns at, PERIOD! (A difference of more than 800 degrees!)

This is how directed mind/media control is managed.

The Hegelian Dialectic is a technique commonly used to bring about a desired result. It is a three step process as follows...

Thesis - A problem is intentionally created
Antithesis - Opposition to the problem is created
Synthesis - The desired result is brought in as a solution

"An example of this was in Germany when Adolph Hitler wanted to pass ’anti-terrorist’ legislation. Hitler wanted the power to detain people without question and hold them in custody without a court hearing. The people of Germany wanted no such thing. So Hitler had the Reichtag building burned to the ground. He then blamed terrorists for this terrible crime.

The media portrayed the event as a danger to society and people’s welfare. The people demanded something be done so Hitler introduced his new anti-terrorist legislation with the people’s consent. I hope this method sounds familiar to you because it is used in all aspects and at all levels of society.

Pay attention to the anti-terrorist legislation being passed due to terrorist incidents which are occurring today. The people who do not understand these things are simply being deceived and yet know it not."

Basically they wanted to pass The Patriot Act, but knew people wouldn't give up their rights willingly. This would allow no habeas corpus rights (right to a fair trial)if you are deemed a "terrorist," and the govt. is allowed to breech any and all of our privacy, by reading our emails, texts, tapping our phones, seeing what we search on the internet, etc. The only way we'd agree to this willingly is if a huge "terrorist" event happened (9/11-"thesis") that threatened our safety, so that we would then pass the Patriot Act (anti-thesis) and give up our rights (synthesis) in the name of "safety," because we'd think that "the govt is trying to protect us!" This is the reality of 9/11.