Thursday, December 19, 2013

Thank you so much for your generous gift of intuition and time. You are helping so many people and I really appreciate you. For those who cannot relocate to Northern CA or the Northern West to Midwest areas, please discuss how life will be in Southern California, particularly Los Angeles, CA (200 meters above sea level) and in the San Bernardino Mountain areas like Big Bear Lake (2000 meters above sea level) and Lake Arrowhead (1560 meters)? In terms of geology, water, radiation, air pollution and the people in those areas, will it be safe to live there? You mentioned May 2014 as a possible time for earth changes in CA, is that still what you see? Do you see the central valley in CA filling with water? If water floods the San Francisco Bay and the central valley from Redding in the north to Bakersfield in the south, how do towns above the central valley fair? Specifically, I am wondering about Yosemite Lakes (475 meters) and Coarsegold (675 meters). They are northwest of Fresno, CA and southeast of Yosemite. In Northern CA, Chico is south of Redding, CA and at 60 meters, will it be safe to live there? Also, you mentioned that Russia may attack an island off the coast of CA. To get a closer idea of location, what city is the island near? Thank you and your loved ones for your time and devotion to helping us all

2:49 PM I was going to do a reading.  I had several questions about California, so let me get started.  This is long, so I am going to break up the questions.  

Q. For those who cannot relocate to Northern CA or the Northern West to Midwest areas, please discuss how life will be in Southern California, particularly Los Angeles, CA (200 meters above sea level) and in the San Bernardino Mountain areas like Big Bear Lake (2000 meters above sea level) and Lake Arrowhead (1560 meters)?
A.  When I focus on Los Angeles, it looks dark to me.  Like the sky is very dark and thick.  The clouds look dark to me.  I don't see water being a huge issue. It looks to me that the biggest you will do deal with in that area is pollution.  It actually feels different than smog, it is thicker and denser.  As if the pollution in the air has weight.  I see people wearing medical doctor masks over their mouth.  People are out and about, they are just cautious.  


I will say in looking at a map and focusing on the Los Angeles area, west of the area will have water issues.  I see high tides, higher than normal.  With the tides I see a lot of sea foam, abnormal amounts.  At first people look at this foam like it is beautiful, different, kind of enjoy it.  Then it becomes more like a pollutant.  What was once the beautiful beach is now infested with this sea foam.  

In terms of San Bernardino, it looks beautiful.  I see Big Bear Lake drying up some, it will be much smaller, but that area feels lush and green.  It looks like a safe haven and people will want to be there if they can get there.  

Q  In terms of geology, water, radiation, air pollution and the people in those areas, will it be safe to live there? You mentioned May 2014 as a possible time for earth changes in CA, is that still what you see?
A. I see "M" 2014, meaning March or May, and May "feels" correct to me.  I see Los Angeles as having a lot of air pollution, to the west of that area there will be land pollution from the water.  I definitely get a "toxic" vibe from this ocean water.  I even see people having trouble trying to sell fish that was obtained in the ocean, it is is like they have to sell it on the black market because people don't want it.  

A huge issue too is all the things that are grown in California.  They have issues due to the pollution in the air.  I see the vineyards being one of places that are highly effected by this.

People do try to get east, but most don't have the resources or means to do so.  

Q. Do you see the central valley in CA filling with water? If water floods the San Francisco Bay and the central valley from Redding in the north to Bakersfield in the south, how do towns above the central valley fair? Specifically, I am wondering about Yosemite Lakes (475 meters) and Coarsegold (675 meters). They are northwest of Fresno, CA and southeast of Yosemite. In Northern CA, Chico is south of Redding, CA and at 60 meters, will it be safe to live there? 
A.  When I look at the map, I do get a chaotic and anxious feeling about the San Francisco area.  I do see higher tides, but the main issue looks like structural problems with the bridges.  There are just much higher and stronger currents than normal.  That creates a lot of anxiety in that area for people traveling or commuting.  

There will be higher tides that take longer to recede, but I see the focus of that being to the west of Highway 101.  Most areas east of Highway 101 looks like they don't have water issues.  The main issue again will be the pollution.  Once you make it to the Yosemite area, even the pollution is greatly reduced.

Q.  Also, you mentioned that Russia may attack an island off the coast of CA. To get a closer idea of location, what city is the island near? 
A. I first get the letter "C" and I want to say Capricorn... so now let me look at a map and see if I can hone that in a little better..   

I feel like I can't find what I am looking, but I can definitely see it so I will describe and hopefully someone in my comments will know what I am talking about.  It looks like a small island.  No one lives there except a very few military people.  It is mainly used as a military base and they do a lot of high tech training, like special ops people.  It looks like a big playground for the military to teach specialized skills.  I see a bridge going to this island, and you have to have very high clearance or permissions to be on this island.   I keep focusing on the area that is slightly north of San Diego.  

And that is all I have for now.  It is 3:25 PM.  Thank you.  Link to Audio.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Bitcoins [Group Posting]




I have had quite a few questions regarding bitcoins, so I thought I would do a group reading on a couple of submissions.  

It is 2:22 PM

Q. Can you look into Bitcoins and tell us if the US government will at some point try to stop us citizens from owning or transacting in them? I know they must be worried about losing tax dollars and of course having a competing currency that they cannot manipulate......or can they?  
A.  Ok, what I get is that the government is not too interested in the bitcoin currency.  What I hear in my head in regards to tax dollars is that the government is WAY more concerned with online transactions than they are with bitcoin,.. and here is why.  There are a ton on online sales, and most people aren't paying tax on those purchases.  Bitcoin is only as useful as the merchants that accept, them so in comparison there are way more people doing things online because of ease, comfortability and most all merchants internationally take online transactions.  

I also don't see bitcoin as a longstanding currency, because the only value is being able to exchange with those that except bitcoin.  Then I get an image of a coin machine in a game arcade- that coin is only valuable to the arcade that takes it or accepts it.  You use real cash that is exchangeable everywhere to buy this limiting form of currency.  It's value is not only not stable, but it isn't backed by anything hard such as gold, metals, diamonds, etc... It's true vale is just having someone else with the goods and services you want or need accepting this form of currency.  

The government doesn't have faith this will uphold, therefore, I don't see them getting involved.  Bitcoin is fairy new, and has a lot of proving to do before it be a substantial threat.  The threat right now regarding lost revenue to the government are online sales.


Q. The US Gov is attempting to understand bitcoins and in some cases demonizing them, and in others embracing them. Since bitcoins could really weaken the us regime, can you tell what their "play" will be? Will they try to crack it and manipulate it they way they do gold and silver, or will they just outlaw it so US citizens cannot transact in bitcoins? Not that that would stop the rest of the world from using it....
A.  Here is what I with regard to that.  The biggest manipulation of bitcoin is how many merchants are in the system willing to accept this as form of payment.  It would be hard to truly manipulate this from that standpoint.  What I see them doing (referring to the government) is allowing bitcoin to function as a form of payments for services, BUT any merchant who takes bitcoin (I see some kind of license or registering taking place) will have to pay a tax on those services.  Specifically a form will have to be filled out (looks like at normal tax time) and records of those sales need to be kept, and reported then.  The buyer isn't hit with the tax, but rather the seller is hit.  I see VISA and Mastercard pop into my head showing me an example of how the government wants Bitcoin once proven to be utilized.

Q.  China seems to be gobbling up all the gold, minerals, and now even bitcoins that it can. Is this a move to weaken the us dollar and attempt to establish something else as the reserve currency of the world? Using bitcoins, which is not chinese, might be a useful way to undermine the USD without it looking like a direct assault. Is this financial war looming and who wins? Will dollars become worthless or only used domestically? (and likely hyperinflated)
A. I don't see China using bitcoin as the next currency.  What I do see is an image of a vacuum and China is on the other end.  It is sucking up everything it can in this vacuum.  I see China wanting to be the next world player. China wants to ensure they have the resources so whatever happens they can step in.  They are waiting their time and even nudging the inevitable collapse of the dollar.  They are highly interested in the economic state of this country.  

I see them putting the "squeeze" on us like a loan shark on a movie would do.  Once things crumble, I see the UN stepping in for a solution because the dollar isn't the stable back up form of currency it once was.  And when that happens, China wants to come in with their new improved, backed by gold, currency and save the day.  I do see the new currency as physical currency but will have an electronic twist, but ALL will be backed.  The UN will be involved and facilitate the currency, but China will be the holder. It looks like the UN is the one in control, and they make the rules, but China is the one that holds the currency and does the administration of it. 

And that is all I have for now.  It is 2:56 PM.  Thank you.  Link to Audio

What is the bright object that is in the southwestern sky shortly after sunset that is being viewed by many across the country and appears to be getting brighter?

2:12 pm. I hope everyone had a good Thanksgiving, and I wanted to do another post..

I have actually seen this object too.  I have spent a lot of time starring at it.  The first thing I see is heat. It is super intense, bright heat.  I believe it is more than just a star, and in fact I do believe that it is a planet.  (I see an image of earth, but it is dark and uninhabited with lava running as rivers).  [In fact the only light is brought on by the lava rivers glowing and burning.] The bright light [we see] is caused by the sun hitting this planet and reflecting in such a way that we can see it.  This planet looks to be Venus and feels fiery hot.  I see molten lava as rivers.  The planet looks like like a huge volcano.  I also see that the way the orbit of this planet intersects with our planet, it is getting physically closer to us.  There is some kind of life cycle with this (in reference to the distance and proximity of this planet).  I hear some scientific voice in head saying "Yes this happens every so many... then it sounds like seventeen.. .years."

And that is all I get with regard to this question.  Thanks.  It is 2:20 pm.  Link to audio (I apologize... my audio file was corrupted and will not upload).